Non-contact, non-visual, multi-person hallway gait monitoring

This paper presents a multi-person gait monitoring system designed for efficient operation in cluttered environments. The system demonstrates robust capabilities in tracking multiple closely spaced individuals and accurately extracting the walking speed, even in the presence of others. We address two significant challenges, including enhancing radar resolution and mitigating multipath effects in cluttered settings. Our method shows remarkable accuracy, with a maximum error of 0.33 m/s and a minimum of 0.005 m/s, as validated through 25 walking tests in a bedrest study. Its adaptability makes it a valuable clinical tool, offering insights for predicting underlying health issues in older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-97757-y
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gait Recognition and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-contact, non-visual, multi-person hallway gait monitoring

Ahmad Ansariyan, Jennifer Boger, Eric T. Hedge, Carmelo Mastrandrea et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Gait Recognition and Analysis
1.35
article

Non-contact, non-visual, multi-person hallway gait monitoring

Ahmad Ansariyan, Jennifer Boger, Eric T. Hedge, Carmelo Mastrandrea, Plinio Pelegrini Morita, George Shaker, Richard L. Hughson, Hajar Abedi, Alexander Wong
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a multi-person gait monitoring system designed for efficient operation in cluttered environments. The system demonstrates robust capabilities in tracking multiple closely spaced individuals and accurately extracting the walking speed, even in the presence of others. We address two significant challenges, including enhancing radar resolution and mitigating multipath effects in cluttered settings. Our method shows remarkable accuracy, with a maximum error of 0.33 m/s and a minimum of 0.005 m/s, as validated through 25 walking tests in a bedrest study. Its adaptability makes it a valuable clinical tool, offering insights for predicting underlying health issues in older adults.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Waterloo (CA), Research Institute for Aging (CA)
McGill University Health Centre, Canadian Frailty Network, Canadian Space Agency, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Gait Recognition and Analysis
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Non-contact, non-visual, multi-person hallway gait monitoring — Ahmad Ansariyan, Jennifer Boger, et al. · Scientific Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS