Recommendations of the Consent and Decision-Making Strand From the National Goals 2024 Conference

This article presents the recommendations developed by the Consent and Decision-Making Strand at the National Goals conference, a platform for leaders in the intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) field to advance research, advocacy, policy, and practice. Over the past decade, self-advocacy efforts, strengths-based approaches, and evolving societal perspectives have contributed to some progress in autonomy and decision-making rights for people with IDD. However, persistent ableist norms coupled with oppressive and systemic barriers continue to limit the human and civil rights to consent and decision-making for people with IDD. Recommendations to advance change include: (1) building a culture of consent, (2) creating clear policies for Supported Decision-Making (SDM), (3) advancing inclusive research practices that empower people with IDD to participate and lead in all aspects of research they choose, (4) innovating with technology to enhance autonomy while ensuring privacy and security, and (5) leveraging data to change education, training, and systems. These recommendations provide a framework for transformative change needed to ensure equitable, inclusive, and accessible consent and decision-making opportunities for people with IDD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Inclusion
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-13.3.190
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recommendations of the Consent and Decision-Making Strand From the National Goals 2024 Conference

Susan M. Havercamp, Sheida K. Raley, Karrie A. Shogren, Allison Hall et al.
Inclusion
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

Recommendations of the Consent and Decision-Making Strand From the National Goals 2024 Conference

Susan M. Havercamp, Sheida K. Raley, Karrie A. Shogren, Allison Hall, Jesse G. Strickler, Makhari Dysart, Naomi Brickel, Nicole LeBlanc, Shawn Ullman
article en

Abstract

This article presents the recommendations developed by the Consent and Decision-Making Strand at the National Goals conference, a platform for leaders in the intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) field to advance research, advocacy, policy, and practice. Over the past decade, self-advocacy efforts, strengths-based approaches, and evolving societal perspectives have contributed to some progress in autonomy and decision-making rights for people with IDD. However, persistent ableist norms coupled with oppressive and systemic barriers continue to limit the human and civil rights to consent and decision-making for people with IDD. Recommendations to advance change include: (1) building a culture of consent, (2) creating clear policies for Supported Decision-Making (SDM), (3) advancing inclusive research practices that empower people with IDD to participate and lead in all aspects of research they choose, (4) innovating with technology to enhance autonomy while ensuring privacy and security, and (5) leveraging data to change education, training, and systems. These recommendations provide a framework for transformative change needed to ensure equitable, inclusive, and accessible consent and decision-making opportunities for people with IDD.

InclusionVol. 13(3)
Temple College (US), Association of University Centers on Disabilities (US), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), Hunter College (US), National Disability Rights Network (US), Human Services Research Institute (US), Institute for Community Inclusion (US), Westchester Institute for Human Development (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US), Temple University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.