Using the EPIC (exposure, persuasion, identification, and commitment) to develop a measure of student buy-in to laboratory learning goals

Buy-in has been described as the series of judgements students make when deciding to engage with a pedagogical practice. Buy-in to pedagogical practices is known to have a meaningful impact on students’ engagement in learning environments, making it a construct of interest for researchers and practitioners. This study develops a measure of student buy-in to faculty defined laboratory learning goals by adapting an existing measure which operationalizes the construct in terms of Exposure, Persuasion, Identification, and Commitment (EPIC). The adapted measure presented in this study, deemed the EPIC-LaG (Laboratory Goals), was developed using learning goals for general and organic chemistry laboratory courses and psychometrically evaluated. Evidence related to response process indicated that students were interpreting and responding to EPIC-LaG items as intended. Structural validity evidence provided support for the unidimensional constructs of Exposure, Persuasion, Identification, and Commitment, as well as for the structural model relating the constructs. Single administration reliability evidence provided support for the internal consistency of the items. Finally, evidence of scalar measurement invariance was found for each group in the study, demonstrating the generalizability of the structural model across groups, which provides support for comparisons made between them. When comparisons were investigated, differences in buy-in pathways were identified between general and organic chemistry laboratory courses, and between ‘cookbook’ and argument-driven inquiry style general chemistry laboratory courses. This study provides psychometric evidence to support the interpretation of EPIC-LaG data and serves as a foundation for others interested in adapting the EPIC-LaG to investigate students’ buy-in to their laboratory learning goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemistry Education Research and Practice
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d5rp00203f
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using the EPIC (exposure, persuasion, identification, and commitment) to develop a measure of student buy-in to laboratory learning goals

Jack Barbera, Elizabeth B. Vaughan, A. Montoya-Cowan
Chemistry Education Research and Practice
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
article

Using the EPIC (exposure, persuasion, identification, and commitment) to develop a measure of student buy-in to laboratory learning goals

Jack Barbera, Elizabeth B. Vaughan, A. Montoya-Cowan
article en

Abstract

Buy-in has been described as the series of judgements students make when deciding to engage with a pedagogical practice. Buy-in to pedagogical practices is known to have a meaningful impact on students’ engagement in learning environments, making it a construct of interest for researchers and practitioners. This study develops a measure of student buy-in to faculty defined laboratory learning goals by adapting an existing measure which operationalizes the construct in terms of Exposure, Persuasion, Identification, and Commitment (EPIC). The adapted measure presented in this study, deemed the EPIC-LaG (Laboratory Goals), was developed using learning goals for general and organic chemistry laboratory courses and psychometrically evaluated. Evidence related to response process indicated that students were interpreting and responding to EPIC-LaG items as intended. Structural validity evidence provided support for the unidimensional constructs of Exposure, Persuasion, Identification, and Commitment, as well as for the structural model relating the constructs. Single administration reliability evidence provided support for the internal consistency of the items. Finally, evidence of scalar measurement invariance was found for each group in the study, demonstrating the generalizability of the structural model across groups, which provides support for comparisons made between them. When comparisons were investigated, differences in buy-in pathways were identified between general and organic chemistry laboratory courses, and between ‘cookbook’ and argument-driven inquiry style general chemistry laboratory courses. This study provides psychometric evidence to support the interpretation of EPIC-LaG data and serves as a foundation for others interested in adapting the EPIC-LaG to investigate students’ buy-in to their laboratory learning goals.

Chemistry Education Research and PracticeVol. 27(1)
Portland State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using the EPIC (exposure, persuasion, identification, and commitment) to develop a measure of student buy-in to laboratory learning goals — Jack Barbera, Elizabeth B. Vaughan, et al. · Chemistry Education Research and Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS