A simple method for quickly estimating solar irradiance forecast errors

In this work, we develop simple linear models that allow users to predict solar irradiance forecast errors based solely on solar variability at a specific location on Earth. These straightforward yet actionable models enable solar forecasters to quickly estimate forecast errors for a given site, providing a clear indication of how well their forecasting models are likely to perform. The error in deterministic solar irradiance forecasts is measured by the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), while solar variability is quantified by the standard deviation of an hourly time series of changes in the dimensionless clear sky index. Sixty sites distributed around the globe are used to build two types of RMSE prediction models. The first type is for intra-day forecasts (1-hour to 6-hour forecast horizons), while the second is for day-ahead forecasts (24-hour horizon). The derivation of the intra-day forecast error prediction model leverages on a non-linear time series approach whereas the one for day-ahead forecast error relies on forecasts issued by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). For each type of model, we calculate also the 2.5% and 97.5% percentiles of the distribution in order to estimate the 95% uncertainty interval associated with the prediction. This uncertainty interval defines the bounds of the RMSE within which 95% of future RMSE values are expected to fall. These error bounds can provide solar forecasters with valuable insights into the performance of their solar forecasting methods in relation to the forecast challenges posed by site-specific variability. Verification against published results in the literature, specifically for seven sites of the SURFRAD network, demonstrates that these models can satisfactorily predict intra-day and day-ahead forecast RMSEs using only site-specific solar variability data. • We build linear models to predict solar forecast errors from solar variability. • Intra-day and day-ahead predictions models are proposed. • Models estimate 95% uncertainty bounds for future forecast verification. • Verification shows good RMSE predictions for diverse global and SURFRAD sites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Solar Energy
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2025.113821
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A simple method for quickly estimating solar irradiance forecast errors

Richard Perez, Elke Lorenz, Josselin Le Gal La Salle, Philippe Lauret et al.
1 citations
Solar Energy
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
2.48
article

A simple method for quickly estimating solar irradiance forecast errors

Richard Perez, Elke Lorenz, Josselin Le Gal La Salle, Philippe Lauret, Mathieu David
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this work, we develop simple linear models that allow users to predict solar irradiance forecast errors based solely on solar variability at a specific location on Earth. These straightforward yet actionable models enable solar forecasters to quickly estimate forecast errors for a given site, providing a clear indication of how well their forecasting models are likely to perform. The error in deterministic solar irradiance forecasts is measured by the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), while solar variability is quantified by the standard deviation of an hourly time series of changes in the dimensionless clear sky index. Sixty sites distributed around the globe are used to build two types of RMSE prediction models. The first type is for intra-day forecasts (1-hour to 6-hour forecast horizons), while the second is for day-ahead forecasts (24-hour horizon). The derivation of the intra-day forecast error prediction model leverages on a non-linear time series approach whereas the one for day-ahead forecast error relies on forecasts issued by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). For each type of model, we calculate also the 2.5% and 97.5% percentiles of the distribution in order to estimate the 95% uncertainty interval associated with the prediction. This uncertainty interval defines the bounds of the RMSE within which 95% of future RMSE values are expected to fall. These error bounds can provide solar forecasters with valuable insights into the performance of their solar forecasting methods in relation to the forecast challenges posed by site-specific variability. Verification against published results in the literature, specifically for seven sites of the SURFRAD network, demonstrates that these models can satisfactorily predict intra-day and day-ahead forecast RMSEs using only site-specific solar variability data. • We build linear models to predict solar forecast errors from solar variability. • Intra-day and day-ahead predictions models are proposed. • Models estimate 95% uncertainty bounds for future forecast verification. • Verification shows good RMSE predictions for diverse global and SURFRAD sites.

Solar EnergyVol. 301
Albany State University (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Corse Pascal Paoli (FR), University of Reunion Island (RE), University at Albany, State University of New York (US), Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (DE), École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (FR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.