EVALUATING UNDERGRADUATE NURSING STUDENTS’ SATISFACTION WITH CLINICAL EXPOSURE AND ACADEMIC LEARNING

Background: This study aimed to assess the satisfaction levels of undergraduate nursing students regarding their clinical and academic experiences at the University of Lahore. Satisfaction is a key indicator of education quality, influencing academic performance, motivation, and professional preparedness. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive design was employed, involving 73 fourth-year nursing students selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire consisting of 22 items on a Likert scale to measure satisfaction levels. Results: The findings showed that 54.4% of students reported average academic satisfaction, while 32.9% expressed high satisfaction and 12.3% reported low satisfaction. In clinical experiences, 47.9% reported average satisfaction, 28.8% had high satisfaction, and 23.3% expressed low satisfaction. Key factors contributing to satisfaction included accessible faculty, clear guidance, and opportunities for hands-on learning. Dissatisfaction was linked to limited feedback, and insufficient opportunities for independent practice. Demographically, the majority of participants were aged 20–25 years, with 57.5% male and 74% having prior healthcare experience. Conclusion: The study underscores the need for improved feedback systems, structured mentorship programs, and enhanced resource allocation to elevate satisfaction levels. These findings provide actionable insights to enhance nursing education quality and better prepare students for professional roles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/r39wmm75
Primary Topic
Nursing education and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EVALUATING UNDERGRADUATE NURSING STUDENTS’ SATISFACTION WITH CLINICAL EXPOSURE AND ACADEMIC LEARNING

S. Ahmed, Amjad Nadeem, Maryam Mehboob
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Nursing education and management
article

EVALUATING UNDERGRADUATE NURSING STUDENTS’ SATISFACTION WITH CLINICAL EXPOSURE AND ACADEMIC LEARNING

S. Ahmed, Amjad Nadeem, Maryam Mehboob
article en

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the satisfaction levels of undergraduate nursing students regarding their clinical and academic experiences at the University of Lahore. Satisfaction is a key indicator of education quality, influencing academic performance, motivation, and professional preparedness. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive design was employed, involving 73 fourth-year nursing students selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire consisting of 22 items on a Likert scale to measure satisfaction levels. Results: The findings showed that 54.4% of students reported average academic satisfaction, while 32.9% expressed high satisfaction and 12.3% reported low satisfaction. In clinical experiences, 47.9% reported average satisfaction, 28.8% had high satisfaction, and 23.3% expressed low satisfaction. Key factors contributing to satisfaction included accessible faculty, clear guidance, and opportunities for hands-on learning. Dissatisfaction was linked to limited feedback, and insufficient opportunities for independent practice. Demographically, the majority of participants were aged 20–25 years, with 57.5% male and 74% having prior healthcare experience. Conclusion: The study underscores the need for improved feedback systems, structured mentorship programs, and enhanced resource allocation to elevate satisfaction levels. These findings provide actionable insights to enhance nursing education quality and better prepare students for professional roles.

Insights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationVol. 3(4 (Health and Allied))
Punjab Institute of Cardiology (PK), Allied Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Nursing education and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.