Disability human rights standards before the European Court of Human Rights—false convergence and methodologically-driven divergence?

ABSTRACT The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) has positively impacted the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Overall, the ECtHR has delivered significant judgments in favour of persons with disabilities and is moving towards a disability-sensitive interpretation of facts. However, in specific areas such as legal capacity, inclusive education, voting, and involuntary treatment, the ECtHR has sharply distanced itself from the CRPD following some initial attempts at harmonizing its norms with that of the treaty. This emerging divergence does not arise from differences in underlying substantive norms, but rather from the ECtHR’s different jurisprudential methods and views on its role relative to the CRPD’s treaty body, as well as the polycentric nature of their respective decisions. Explaining the nature of the disagreement is key to understanding what role adjudicative bodies can play in promoting disability rights, and whether their norms can be harmonized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Rights Law Review
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaf027
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Discrimination and Equality Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disability human rights standards before the European Court of Human Rights—false convergence and methodologically-driven divergence?

Michael Ashley Stein, János Fiala-Butora, Matthew S. Smith
1 citations
Human Rights Law Review
Discrimination and Equality Law
15.98
article

Disability human rights standards before the European Court of Human Rights—false convergence and methodologically-driven divergence?

Michael Ashley Stein, János Fiala-Butora, Matthew S. Smith
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) has positively impacted the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Overall, the ECtHR has delivered significant judgments in favour of persons with disabilities and is moving towards a disability-sensitive interpretation of facts. However, in specific areas such as legal capacity, inclusive education, voting, and involuntary treatment, the ECtHR has sharply distanced itself from the CRPD following some initial attempts at harmonizing its norms with that of the treaty. This emerging divergence does not arise from differences in underlying substantive norms, but rather from the ECtHR’s different jurisprudential methods and views on its role relative to the CRPD’s treaty body, as well as the polycentric nature of their respective decisions. Explaining the nature of the disagreement is key to understanding what role adjudicative bodies can play in promoting disability rights, and whether their norms can be harmonized.

Human Rights Law ReviewVol. 25(3)
Harvard College Observatory (US), COPE Galway (IE), Institute for Legal Studies (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Discrimination and Equality Law
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.