Організаційні засади дуальної освіти в країнах Європейського Союзу

The article outlines the organizational foundations of dual education in European Union countries, focusing on the integration of learning and practical work experience within national vocational education and training systems. It examines different models of combining theoretical instruction with work-based learning, commonly referred to as alternating or dual systems. These models include comprehensive apprenticeship systems, programs in which internships are combined with other forms of vocational education, vocational schools with a significant proportion of workplace training, and predominantly school-based VET programs. Special attention is paid to the structural features of the educational process and the roles of the state, social partners, and employers in ensuring the quality of vocational training. The article analyzes how legislative frameworks, national curriculum standards, and professional qualification regulations contribute to the effectiveness and reliability of dual education systems. Comprehensive apprenticeship systems in countries such as Austria, Denmark, and Germany are highlighted as examples where practical training is fully integrated with theoretical instruction and closely aligned with labor market needs. In these systems, apprenticeship is legally regulated, supported by employers and public institutions, and widely recognized and valued by young people. Participants receive paid internships that complement their formal education, enabling them to develop comprehensive professional competencies and achieve qualifications acknowledged across the labor market. These programs offer opportunities for both general and vocational learning, contributing to the overall personal and professional development of students. The organizational foundations of dual education are based on a collaborative relationship between the state, social partners, and education institutions. The state establishes standards for curricula and theoretical instruction, while employers and professional associations are primarily responsible for practical training and quality assurance. This model ensures flexibility and adaptability to labor market demands, allowing vocational education to respond to changing economic conditions and sectoral requirements. Furthermore, dual education provides alternative pathways for students, reducing early school leaving and supporting social inclusion. By combining structured workplace experience with formal education, these systems help young people transition smoothly into the labor market, enhancing employability and career prospects. The dual model also fosters close cooperation between businesses and schools, encouraging mutual accountability and continuous improvement of training standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Педагогічні науки теорія історія інноваційні технології
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24139/2312-5993/2024.05/486-495
Primary Topic
Vocational Education and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Організаційні засади дуальної освіти в країнах Європейського Союзу

Тетяна Кукса
Педагогічні науки теорія історія інноваційні технології
Vocational Education and Training
article

Організаційні засади дуальної освіти в країнах Європейського Союзу

Тетяна Кукса
article en

Abstract

The article outlines the organizational foundations of dual education in European Union countries, focusing on the integration of learning and practical work experience within national vocational education and training systems. It examines different models of combining theoretical instruction with work-based learning, commonly referred to as alternating or dual systems. These models include comprehensive apprenticeship systems, programs in which internships are combined with other forms of vocational education, vocational schools with a significant proportion of workplace training, and predominantly school-based VET programs. Special attention is paid to the structural features of the educational process and the roles of the state, social partners, and employers in ensuring the quality of vocational training. The article analyzes how legislative frameworks, national curriculum standards, and professional qualification regulations contribute to the effectiveness and reliability of dual education systems. Comprehensive apprenticeship systems in countries such as Austria, Denmark, and Germany are highlighted as examples where practical training is fully integrated with theoretical instruction and closely aligned with labor market needs. In these systems, apprenticeship is legally regulated, supported by employers and public institutions, and widely recognized and valued by young people. Participants receive paid internships that complement their formal education, enabling them to develop comprehensive professional competencies and achieve qualifications acknowledged across the labor market. These programs offer opportunities for both general and vocational learning, contributing to the overall personal and professional development of students. The organizational foundations of dual education are based on a collaborative relationship between the state, social partners, and education institutions. The state establishes standards for curricula and theoretical instruction, while employers and professional associations are primarily responsible for practical training and quality assurance. This model ensures flexibility and adaptability to labor market demands, allowing vocational education to respond to changing economic conditions and sectoral requirements. Furthermore, dual education provides alternative pathways for students, reducing early school leaving and supporting social inclusion. By combining structured workplace experience with formal education, these systems help young people transition smoothly into the labor market, enhancing employability and career prospects. The dual model also fosters close cooperation between businesses and schools, encouraging mutual accountability and continuous improvement of training standards.

Педагогічні науки теорія історія інноваційні технології
Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A. S. Makarenko (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Vocational Education and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.