Comparative analysis of cognitive functions in male college E-sport players and non-gamers

Introduction: Electronic sports (E-sport) may improve cognitive function by using magnetic resonance imaging. There is limited data on evaluating cognitive functions in E-sport players by the cognitive tests. Objective: To evaluate cognitive function in E-sport players by using a cognitive test. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study and enrolled male college students with an age of 18 years or older who agreed to participate the study and practiced any types of E-sport regularly at least three times/week for at least one year (E-sport) or no exercise (control). Eligible participants were evaluated for the cognitive test by using a computer-based program which was comprised of seven categories. Results: There were 35 male college students enrolled in the E-sport group and the control group. The E-sport group had shorter reaction times of correct responses in simple reaction time test (266.94 vs 308.54 msec; p < 0.001) than the control group, but longer reaction times of correct responses in choice reaction time test (387.54 vs 316.23 msec; p < 0.001) and incongruent (471.69 vs 434.69 msec; p < 0.001) than the control group. For the accuracy of responses, the E-sport group had a significant higher percentage of accuracy responses in simple reaction time test (93.57% vs 61.54%; p < 0.001), choice reaction time test (82.60% vs 51.60%; p < 0.001), and congruent (89.34% vs 84.06; p = 0.040). Conclusion: E-sport players may have better specific cognitive function in terms of speed and accuracy than the control group in male collegiate students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Retos
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v71.117120
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of cognitive functions in male college E-sport players and non-gamers

Tanapol Kaewwong, Surumpa Charoensuk Kaewwong, Onwaree Ingkatecha, Kittisak Sawanyawisuth et al.
Retos
Sports Performance and Training
article

Comparative analysis of cognitive functions in male college E-sport players and non-gamers

Tanapol Kaewwong, Surumpa Charoensuk Kaewwong, Onwaree Ingkatecha, Kittisak Sawanyawisuth, Yanyong Phanpheng, Austtasit Chainarong, Wareerat Pila
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Electronic sports (E-sport) may improve cognitive function by using magnetic resonance imaging. There is limited data on evaluating cognitive functions in E-sport players by the cognitive tests. Objective: To evaluate cognitive function in E-sport players by using a cognitive test. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study and enrolled male college students with an age of 18 years or older who agreed to participate the study and practiced any types of E-sport regularly at least three times/week for at least one year (E-sport) or no exercise (control). Eligible participants were evaluated for the cognitive test by using a computer-based program which was comprised of seven categories. Results: There were 35 male college students enrolled in the E-sport group and the control group. The E-sport group had shorter reaction times of correct responses in simple reaction time test (266.94 vs 308.54 msec; p < 0.001) than the control group, but longer reaction times of correct responses in choice reaction time test (387.54 vs 316.23 msec; p < 0.001) and incongruent (471.69 vs 434.69 msec; p < 0.001) than the control group. For the accuracy of responses, the E-sport group had a significant higher percentage of accuracy responses in simple reaction time test (93.57% vs 61.54%; p < 0.001), choice reaction time test (82.60% vs 51.60%; p < 0.001), and congruent (89.34% vs 84.06; p = 0.040). Conclusion: E-sport players may have better specific cognitive function in terms of speed and accuracy than the control group in male collegiate students.

RetosVol. 71
Khon Kaen University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.