Inter‐population variation in demographic responses to environmental changes: insights from four seabird populations

The variability in responses to environmental change between populations remains poorly quantified and understood. This shortcoming has major consequences, as variation and flexibility of life‐history traits between populations contribute to the estimation of the adaptive potential, which is necessary for predicting the responses of interconnected populations to environmental change. Here, we use 20–50 years of capture‐mark‐recapture data from four populations of two closely related species in the southern Indian Ocean, the sooty albatross Phoebetria fusca and the light‐mantled sooty albatross Phoebetria palpebrata , to analyze their demographic responses to environmental changes across an oceanic basin scale. We assessed the role of climate and oceanographic conditions as bottom–up forcings and fisheries bycatch as a top–down forcing on survival and three reproductive parameters in each population. We found expected demographic responses: negative effects of fishing effort on survival and breeding success, positive effects of wind velocity on breeding success, negative effects of warm sea surface temperature anomalies, and positive effects of sea ice concentration. Furthermore, our results highlight differences between populations, revealing three main outcomes. First, the two populations situated at the edge of their distribution seemed more affected by variations in oceanographic conditions than counterparts situated within the core of their ranges. Second, the two northernmost populations experiencing lower wind speed, had their breeding success affected by meridional wind speed. Third, a large‐scale climate index had opposite effects on demographic parameters of the two populations situated in the western and eastern parts of the southern Indian Ocean. This comparison of the variation in demographic responses to environmental conditions at the inter‐population level, sheds light on our limited understanding of the processes that account for life‐history trait variation between populations and suggests that local environmental conditions and large‐scale climate patterns may drive the diversity of local ecological responses across species' ranges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oikos
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/oik.11364
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inter‐population variation in demographic responses to environmental changes: insights from four seabird populations

Dominique Joubert, Christophe Barbraud, Ruijiao Sun, Karine Delord et al.
Oikos
Avian ecology and behavior
article

Inter‐population variation in demographic responses to environmental changes: insights from four seabird populations

Dominique Joubert, Christophe Barbraud, Ruijiao Sun, Karine Delord, C Schatz, Samuel Peroteau
article en

Abstract

The variability in responses to environmental change between populations remains poorly quantified and understood. This shortcoming has major consequences, as variation and flexibility of life‐history traits between populations contribute to the estimation of the adaptive potential, which is necessary for predicting the responses of interconnected populations to environmental change. Here, we use 20–50 years of capture‐mark‐recapture data from four populations of two closely related species in the southern Indian Ocean, the sooty albatross Phoebetria fusca and the light‐mantled sooty albatross Phoebetria palpebrata , to analyze their demographic responses to environmental changes across an oceanic basin scale. We assessed the role of climate and oceanographic conditions as bottom–up forcings and fisheries bycatch as a top–down forcing on survival and three reproductive parameters in each population. We found expected demographic responses: negative effects of fishing effort on survival and breeding success, positive effects of wind velocity on breeding success, negative effects of warm sea surface temperature anomalies, and positive effects of sea ice concentration. Furthermore, our results highlight differences between populations, revealing three main outcomes. First, the two populations situated at the edge of their distribution seemed more affected by variations in oceanographic conditions than counterparts situated within the core of their ranges. Second, the two northernmost populations experiencing lower wind speed, had their breeding success affected by meridional wind speed. Third, a large‐scale climate index had opposite effects on demographic parameters of the two populations situated in the western and eastern parts of the southern Indian Ocean. This comparison of the variation in demographic responses to environmental conditions at the inter‐population level, sheds light on our limited understanding of the processes that account for life‐history trait variation between populations and suggests that local environmental conditions and large‐scale climate patterns may drive the diversity of local ecological responses across species' ranges.

OikosVol. 2025(11)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (FR)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Polaire Français Paul Emile Victor, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Terres Australes et Antarctiques Françaises, La Rochelle Université
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Avian ecology and behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.