X—Kant’s Analytic Method and the Argument of <i>Groundwork</i>   <i>I</i>

Abstract In the famous first section of the Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant sets out to identify the principle of morality, but each of the main steps of his argument has been said to encounter serious difficulties. In this essay, I argue that most of these difficulties can be resolved by reading Kant’s argument in light of his views on philosophical method. Using his description of the ‘analytic method’, I reconstruct the steps leading to the identification of the moral principle and show that they form a chain of what he calls ‘regressive’ reasoning. This reconstruction offers solutions to the three main difficulties diagnosed in the literature, although several unclarities remain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
Published
2025-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoaf009
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

X—Kant’s Analytic Method and the Argument of Groundwork   I

Pauline Kleingeld
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

X—Kant’s Analytic Method and the Argument of Groundwork   I

Pauline Kleingeld
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the famous first section of the Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant sets out to identify the principle of morality, but each of the main steps of his argument has been said to encounter serious difficulties. In this essay, I argue that most of these difficulties can be resolved by reading Kant’s argument in light of his views on philosophical method. Using his description of the ‘analytic method’, I reconstruct the steps leading to the identification of the moral principle and show that they form a chain of what he calls ‘regressive’ reasoning. This reconstruction offers solutions to the three main difficulties diagnosed in the literature, although several unclarities remain.

Proceedings of the Aristotelian SocietyVol. 125(2)
University of Groningen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.