Evaluating Environmental Impacts of Deep Foundations: a Life Cycle Approach for Sustainability

This study presents a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of four deep foundation systems—Steel H-Section Piles (SHP), Continuous Flight Auger Piles (CFA), Bored Piles (BP), and Precast Concrete Piles (PCP)—used in a 19-story residential building in Natal, Brazil. The objective is to quantify the environmental impacts of each system and compare these results with technical and economic factors to evaluate overall sustainability. Using ABNT ISO 14040/44 standards and a cradle-to-site boundary, the LCA assesses emissions and resource use during material manufacturing, transportation, and installation stages. The results reveal that while CFA piles are the most economically viable, PCP piles offer the best environmental performance in terms of greenhouse gas emissions. SHP piles, due to the steel production process, exhibited the highest environmental impacts. These findings highlight the importance of integrating environmental factors in foundation design and contribute to the growing body of knowledge aimed at reducing the environmental impacts of construction practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37308/dfieffc251580305
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Environmental Impacts of Deep Foundations: a Life Cycle Approach for Sustainability

Borgatto André Vinícius Azevedo
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
article

Evaluating Environmental Impacts of Deep Foundations: a Life Cycle Approach for Sustainability

Borgatto André Vinícius Azevedo
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of four deep foundation systems—Steel H-Section Piles (SHP), Continuous Flight Auger Piles (CFA), Bored Piles (BP), and Precast Concrete Piles (PCP)—used in a 19-story residential building in Natal, Brazil. The objective is to quantify the environmental impacts of each system and compare these results with technical and economic factors to evaluate overall sustainability. Using ABNT ISO 14040/44 standards and a cradle-to-site boundary, the LCA assesses emissions and resource use during material manufacturing, transportation, and installation stages. The results reveal that while CFA piles are the most economically viable, PCP piles offer the best environmental performance in terms of greenhouse gas emissions. SHP piles, due to the steel production process, exhibited the highest environmental impacts. These findings highlight the importance of integrating environmental factors in foundation design and contribute to the growing body of knowledge aimed at reducing the environmental impacts of construction practices.

Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.