Estimating the Effect of Structured Vocabulary Review

This study investigates the impact of structured vocabulary review on vocabulary acquisition among middle-grade students (grades 6–8) using an experimental, parallel design. Twenty-four classrooms (310 students) were randomly assigned to review different sets of academic vocabulary. Students completed 20 weeks of the Word Generation curriculum, followed by a structured, three-day vocabulary review. Prior research indicates that vocabulary knowledge significantly influences reading comprehension, but single exposures to academic vocabulary typically do not lead to lasting retention. Structured vocabulary review provides repeated encounters with target words through reading, discussion, and interactive activities, supporting both receptive and productive vocabulary use. Generalized linear mixed models revealed that structured review increased the odds of correctly answering reviewed vocabulary items at posttest by 40%. A secondary analysis suggested a potential interaction between semantic diversity of words and treatment effects, though further exploration is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Elementary School Journal
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/736758
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the Effect of Structured Vocabulary Review

Emily Phillips Galloway, Joshua F. Lawrence, Judy Yu-Li Hsu
2 citations
The Elementary School Journal
Reading and Literacy Development
6.89
article

Estimating the Effect of Structured Vocabulary Review

Emily Phillips Galloway, Joshua F. Lawrence, Judy Yu-Li Hsu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of structured vocabulary review on vocabulary acquisition among middle-grade students (grades 6–8) using an experimental, parallel design. Twenty-four classrooms (310 students) were randomly assigned to review different sets of academic vocabulary. Students completed 20 weeks of the Word Generation curriculum, followed by a structured, three-day vocabulary review. Prior research indicates that vocabulary knowledge significantly influences reading comprehension, but single exposures to academic vocabulary typically do not lead to lasting retention. Structured vocabulary review provides repeated encounters with target words through reading, discussion, and interactive activities, supporting both receptive and productive vocabulary use. Generalized linear mixed models revealed that structured review increased the odds of correctly answering reviewed vocabulary items at posttest by 40%. A secondary analysis suggested a potential interaction between semantic diversity of words and treatment effects, though further exploration is required.

The Elementary School JournalVol. 126(1)
University of Oslo (NO), Vanderbilt University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Reading and Literacy Development
6.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Estimating the Effect of Structured Vocabulary Review — Emily Phillips Galloway, Joshua F. Lawrence, et al. · The Elementary School Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS