Double Decker Decision Framework with Fuzzy Data for Multi-Attribute Decision-Making

This paper presents a new framework for decision-making with fuzzy data. Specifically, in a double-decker setup, the first deck contains methods that perform rank value calculation of alternatives. The second deck fuses the rank order to provide a holistic ordering of alternatives. The first deck is highly scalable, as it can accommodate multiple approaches for ranking, and the final ordering is obtained by sending the rank orders from the first deck to the second—where the simple rank procedure is utilized. Earlier frameworks cannot perform rank fusion or use techniques like averaging and the Borda count without considering the personal choice of alternatives. This framework circumvents this challenge, and its usefulness is demonstrated through numerical examples.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science Advances.
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31181/msa2120259
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Double Decker Decision Framework with Fuzzy Data for Multi-Attribute Decision-Making

1 citations
Management Science Advances.
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
article

Double Decker Decision Framework with Fuzzy Data for Multi-Attribute Decision-Making

article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a new framework for decision-making with fuzzy data. Specifically, in a double-decker setup, the first deck contains methods that perform rank value calculation of alternatives. The second deck fuses the rank order to provide a holistic ordering of alternatives. The first deck is highly scalable, as it can accommodate multiple approaches for ranking, and the final ordering is obtained by sending the rank orders from the first deck to the second—where the simple rank procedure is utilized. Earlier frameworks cannot perform rank fusion or use techniques like averaging and the Borda count without considering the personal choice of alternatives. This framework circumvents this challenge, and its usefulness is demonstrated through numerical examples.

Management Science Advances.Vol. 2(1)
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.