Evaluation of Drumsticks of Chickens Under On-station Conditions

The study was conducted to evaluate the drumstick meat quality attributes of different chicken genotypes under On-station condition. Drumstick meat quality traits were assessed over a 24-week period under on-station conditions for six chicken genotypes: Cosmopolitan (C), Improved Horro (H), HC (♂Improved Horro × ♀Cosmopolitan), CH (♂Cosmopolitan × ♀Improved Horro), Indigenous (L), and Koekoek (KK). The study utilized a completely randomized design (CRD), and the data were analyzed using the General Linear Model (GLM) in SAS software. A total of 144 chickens from the six genotypes were used. For each genotype, around 24 chickens were slaughtered, with each drumstick cut samples replicated six times. The shear force (WBSF) was significantly highest in the KK genotype, followed by C and CH, while the L genotype exhibited the lowest WBSF. Drumstick meats from the L and HC genotypes demonstrated the highest water-holding capacity (WHC), with C and HC also showing elevated values. In contrast, the KK genotype had the lowest WHC. The pH45 value was lowest in KK, with slightly higher values in C and HC, while the H genotype recorded a higher pH45 value. The L genotype exhibited the highest pH45 value significantly. The pH24 value was significantly higher in the L drumstick compared to H and HC, with the lowest values in C, CH, and KK. Cooking loss (CL) was significantly greater in the KK, CH, and C genotypes than in H, HC, and L. Drip loss (DL) values were highest in KK and CH, followed by C and HC, while L had the lowest DL. Lightness (L*) values were significantly higher in KK, CH, and C than in HC and H, with L showing the lowest score. Additionally, the redness (a*) score was significantly lower in KK, CH, and HC compared to H, C, and KK, whereas the yellowness (b*) score was significantly higher in KK, CH, and C than in HC, H, and L. Chroma (C*) and hue angle (h*) values were notably greater in the KK, CH, and C genotypes than in HC, H, and L. In conclusion, these findings underscore the substantial influence of genetic variations on drumstick meat quality attributes of different chicken genotypes. This study could serve as a valuable reference for future research on the quality characteristics of drumstick meat in various chicken genotypes, supporting efforts in poultry selection and breeding to enhance meat quality.

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34104/ijavs.025.01750184
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Drumsticks of Chickens Under On-station Conditions

Australian Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

Evaluation of Drumsticks of Chickens Under On-station Conditions

article en

Abstract

The study was conducted to evaluate the drumstick meat quality attributes of different chicken genotypes under On-station condition. Drumstick meat quality traits were assessed over a 24-week period under on-station conditions for six chicken genotypes: Cosmopolitan (C), Improved Horro (H), HC (♂Improved Horro × ♀Cosmopolitan), CH (♂Cosmopolitan × ♀Improved Horro), Indigenous (L), and Koekoek (KK). The study utilized a completely randomized design (CRD), and the data were analyzed using the General Linear Model (GLM) in SAS software. A total of 144 chickens from the six genotypes were used. For each genotype, around 24 chickens were slaughtered, with each drumstick cut samples replicated six times. The shear force (WBSF) was significantly highest in the KK genotype, followed by C and CH, while the L genotype exhibited the lowest WBSF. Drumstick meats from the L and HC genotypes demonstrated the highest water-holding capacity (WHC), with C and HC also showing elevated values. In contrast, the KK genotype had the lowest WHC. The pH45 value was lowest in KK, with slightly higher values in C and HC, while the H genotype recorded a higher pH45 value. The L genotype exhibited the highest pH45 value significantly. The pH24 value was significantly higher in the L drumstick compared to H and HC, with the lowest values in C, CH, and KK. Cooking loss (CL) was significantly greater in the KK, CH, and C genotypes than in H, HC, and L. Drip loss (DL) values were highest in KK and CH, followed by C and HC, while L had the lowest DL. Lightness (L*) values were significantly higher in KK, CH, and C than in HC and H, with L showing the lowest score. Additionally, the redness (a*) score was significantly lower in KK, CH, and HC compared to H, C, and KK, whereas the yellowness (b*) score was significantly higher in KK, CH, and C than in HC, H, and L. Chroma (C*) and hue angle (h*) values were notably greater in the KK, CH, and C genotypes than in HC, H, and L. In conclusion, these findings underscore the substantial influence of genetic variations on drumstick meat quality attributes of different chicken genotypes. This study could serve as a valuable reference for future research on the quality characteristics of drumstick meat in various chicken genotypes, supporting efforts in poultry selection and breeding to enhance meat quality.

Australian Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Drumsticks of Chickens Under On-station Conditions · Australian Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS