Dispelling Snake Bite Myths in Sri Lanka: Ensuring Proper Management and Safety

Snake bites remain a significant public health issue in Sri Lanka due to prevalent myths and misconceptions that can hinder effective treatment and increase the risk of complications. This study aimed to debunk common myths and provide accurate information to guide appropriate responses and ensure proper management. A cross-sectional study was conducted in a village in Sri Lanka's North Central region, interviewing heads of households using a pre-designed questionnaire. Key findings revealed several harmful misconceptions. The belief that cutting and sucking the bite site removes venom is ineffective and can introduce bacteria, while applying a tourniquet can restrict blood flow and lead to severe complications. Identifying the snake species is not crucial for antivenom treatment, as most antivenoms are polyvalent. Additionally, the notion that snake charmers can safely handle and cure snake bites is unfounded, and the belief in the effectiveness of certain plants or herbs for neutralizing venom is scientifically unsupported. These findings highlight the urgent need for public health interventions to address snake bite myths and promote evidence-based practices. By disseminating accurate information and improving access to healthcare, the burden of snake bites in Sri Lanka can be significantly reduced

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kasmera
Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56903/kasmera.5341855
Primary Topic
Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dispelling Snake Bite Myths in Sri Lanka: Ensuring Proper Management and Safety

Prasanna Herath, Faiz Marikar, K. M. S. Bandara, Shyama Banneheka et al.
Kasmera
Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
article

Dispelling Snake Bite Myths in Sri Lanka: Ensuring Proper Management and Safety

Prasanna Herath, Faiz Marikar, K. M. S. Bandara, Shyama Banneheka, Minol Amarakoon
article en

Abstract

Snake bites remain a significant public health issue in Sri Lanka due to prevalent myths and misconceptions that can hinder effective treatment and increase the risk of complications. This study aimed to debunk common myths and provide accurate information to guide appropriate responses and ensure proper management. A cross-sectional study was conducted in a village in Sri Lanka's North Central region, interviewing heads of households using a pre-designed questionnaire. Key findings revealed several harmful misconceptions. The belief that cutting and sucking the bite site removes venom is ineffective and can introduce bacteria, while applying a tourniquet can restrict blood flow and lead to severe complications. Identifying the snake species is not crucial for antivenom treatment, as most antivenoms are polyvalent. Additionally, the notion that snake charmers can safely handle and cure snake bites is unfounded, and the belief in the effectiveness of certain plants or herbs for neutralizing venom is scientifically unsupported. These findings highlight the urgent need for public health interventions to address snake bite myths and promote evidence-based practices. By disseminating accurate information and improving access to healthcare, the burden of snake bites in Sri Lanka can be significantly reduced

KasmeraVol. 53
University of Peradeniya (LK), General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University (LK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.