The Role of Detergents: Triton X-100 versus SDS in Reducing Contaminants During Genomic DNA Extraction from Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteria

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of Triton X-100 and SDS detergents in extracting genomic DNA from Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria using the phenol-chloroform method. Each detergent was used at a 10% concentration in the lysis solution to determine its effect on the purity and concentration of the extracted DNA. The results showed that the DNA extracted using Triton X-100 had higher purity compared to that extracted using SDS. The average protein purity (A260/A280) was 1.7 for Triton X-100 versus 1.0 for SDS. Similarly, carbohydrate purity (A260/A230) averaged 1.64 and 1.26, respectively. Although the final concentration of the extracted DNA was comparable using both detergents, Triton X-100 clearly excelled in reducing protein and carbohydrate contamination. This study emphasizes the importance of selecting suitable compounds to obtain purer DNA, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of molecular applications, such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The study also suggests the possibility of using Triton X-100 as a lower-cost and more efficient alternative compared to SDS, with a need for further studies to evaluate the impact of DNA purity on the results of various molecular applications.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AlQalam Journal of Medical and Applied Sciences
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54361/ajmas.258377
Primary Topic
Chromium effects and bioremediation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Detergents: Triton X-100 versus SDS in Reducing Contaminants During Genomic DNA Extraction from Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteria

AlQalam Journal of Medical and Applied Sciences
Chromium effects and bioremediation
article

The Role of Detergents: Triton X-100 versus SDS in Reducing Contaminants During Genomic DNA Extraction from Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteria

article en

Abstract

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of Triton X-100 and SDS detergents in extracting genomic DNA from Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria using the phenol-chloroform method. Each detergent was used at a 10% concentration in the lysis solution to determine its effect on the purity and concentration of the extracted DNA. The results showed that the DNA extracted using Triton X-100 had higher purity compared to that extracted using SDS. The average protein purity (A260/A280) was 1.7 for Triton X-100 versus 1.0 for SDS. Similarly, carbohydrate purity (A260/A230) averaged 1.64 and 1.26, respectively. Although the final concentration of the extracted DNA was comparable using both detergents, Triton X-100 clearly excelled in reducing protein and carbohydrate contamination. This study emphasizes the importance of selecting suitable compounds to obtain purer DNA, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of molecular applications, such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The study also suggests the possibility of using Triton X-100 as a lower-cost and more efficient alternative compared to SDS, with a need for further studies to evaluate the impact of DNA purity on the results of various molecular applications.

AlQalam Journal of Medical and Applied Sciences
Sebha University (LY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Chromium effects and bioremediation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Role of Detergents: Triton X-100 versus SDS in Reducing Contaminants During Genomic DNA Extraction from Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteria · AlQalam Journal of Medical and Applied Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS