Active Microbiological Surveillance for Contrasting Multi-Drug-Resistant Pathogens: Comparison Between a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Method and Culture

<b>Background/Objectives</b>. Multi-drug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms pose a significant challenge in healthcare settings, particularly with beta-lactam-resistant Gram-negative bacteria and glycopeptide-resistant enterococci. Culture represents the most reliable technique in determining their presence within surveillance swabs. However, it requires a long time-to-result (TTR) and shows low sensitivity. Molecular techniques integrate diagnostic procedures, allowing TTR reduction and precise identification of genes. <b>Methods</b>. During our usual surveillance campaign, we had the opportunity to evaluate the Allplex Entero-DR assay (Seegene Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea) and the Entero-DR Plus assay (Arrow Diagnostics srl, Genova, Italy) molecular kits for the detection of extended-β-lactamases (ESBL), carbapenem- and vancomycin-resistant genes, as well as <i>Acinetobacter</i> spp. and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> spp. identification directly from rectal swabs. A comparison between these tests and the culture-based routine completed the study. <b>Results</b>. The analysis included 300 rectal swabs from the University Hospital Policlinico (Catania, Italy). One hundred and eighty-eight samples (62.6%) resulted as positive for at least one Allplex™ target, reaching optimal sensitivity and negative predictive value (100%). Our results underlined the ubiquitous <i>bla</i>CTX-M and <i>van</i> genes presence and demonstrated the diffusion of double-carbapenemases genes and metallo-β-lactamases-producing strains. In our epidemiological setting, few data were collected about carbapenem-resistant <i>P. aeruginosa</i> and <i>Acinetobacter</i> spp., which require further evaluations on simultaneous respiratory colonization and higher sample numbers. <b>Conclusions</b>. Our analysis highlighted the importance of combining conventional and advanced diagnostic methods in investigating MDR pathogens. The right approach should be based on the prevalence and variability of resistance mechanisms within a specific epidemiological area. Remarkably, molecular screenings may exclude negative samples within high-risk areas due to a significant negative predictive value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15172128
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Active Microbiological Surveillance for Contrasting Multi-Drug-Resistant Pathogens: Comparison Between a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Method and Culture

Stefania Stefani, Maddalena Calvo, Guido Scalia, Gaetano Maugeri
Diagnostics
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

Active Microbiological Surveillance for Contrasting Multi-Drug-Resistant Pathogens: Comparison Between a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Method and Culture

Stefania Stefani, Maddalena Calvo, Guido Scalia, Gaetano Maugeri
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>. Multi-drug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms pose a significant challenge in healthcare settings, particularly with beta-lactam-resistant Gram-negative bacteria and glycopeptide-resistant enterococci. Culture represents the most reliable technique in determining their presence within surveillance swabs. However, it requires a long time-to-result (TTR) and shows low sensitivity. Molecular techniques integrate diagnostic procedures, allowing TTR reduction and precise identification of genes. <b>Methods</b>. During our usual surveillance campaign, we had the opportunity to evaluate the Allplex Entero-DR assay (Seegene Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea) and the Entero-DR Plus assay (Arrow Diagnostics srl, Genova, Italy) molecular kits for the detection of extended-β-lactamases (ESBL), carbapenem- and vancomycin-resistant genes, as well as <i>Acinetobacter</i> spp. and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> spp. identification directly from rectal swabs. A comparison between these tests and the culture-based routine completed the study. <b>Results</b>. The analysis included 300 rectal swabs from the University Hospital Policlinico (Catania, Italy). One hundred and eighty-eight samples (62.6%) resulted as positive for at least one Allplex™ target, reaching optimal sensitivity and negative predictive value (100%). Our results underlined the ubiquitous <i>bla</i>CTX-M and <i>van</i> genes presence and demonstrated the diffusion of double-carbapenemases genes and metallo-β-lactamases-producing strains. In our epidemiological setting, few data were collected about carbapenem-resistant <i>P. aeruginosa</i> and <i>Acinetobacter</i> spp., which require further evaluations on simultaneous respiratory colonization and higher sample numbers. <b>Conclusions</b>. Our analysis highlighted the importance of combining conventional and advanced diagnostic methods in investigating MDR pathogens. The right approach should be based on the prevalence and variability of resistance mechanisms within a specific epidemiological area. Remarkably, molecular screenings may exclude negative samples within high-risk areas due to a significant negative predictive value.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(17)
University of Catania (IT), Policlinico Universitario di Catania (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.