Transperineal MRI-US Fusion-Guided Biopsy with Systematic Sampling for Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Implications Across PI-RADS

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI-ultrasound (US) fusion-targeted biopsy have improved prostate cancer diagnosis, particularly for clinically significant disease. However, the added value of combining systematic biopsy with targeted biopsy remains debated. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI-US fusion-targeted and systematic transperineal biopsies in detecting prostate cancer and explore the correlation between PI-RADS score and histology. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively analyzed 356 patients with 452 MRI-detected lesions who underwent both MRI-US fusion-targeted and transperineal systematic biopsies between 2020 and 2023. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was defined as International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade ≥ 2. Diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy) were calculated for each technique using the combined result as a reference. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients under active surveillance. <b>Results</b>: Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 323 of 452 lesions (71%) and csPCa in 223 lesions (49%). Targeted biopsy demonstrated higher sensitivity (93.7%) and accuracy (79.9%) than systematic biopsy (85.7% sensitivity and 77.6% accuracy), although systematic biopsy provided slightly higher specificity. Systematic biopsy alone identified 8.2% of PCa cases missed by targeted biopsy and upgraded 9.9% of lesions to csPCa. csPCa detection increased with PI-RADS score (23% in PI-RADS 3 and 73% in PI-RADS 5). In active surveillance patients, csPCa was found in 65% of lesions. <b>Conclusions</b>: MRI-US fusion-targeted biopsy improves csPCa detection, but systematic biopsy remains valuable, especially for identifying additional or higher-grade disease. The combined approach provides an optimal diagnostic yield, supporting its continued use in both initial and repeat biopsy settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17172735
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transperineal MRI-US Fusion-Guided Biopsy with Systematic Sampling for Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Implications Across PI-RADS

Ignacio Asiaín, Valèria Richart, R. Salvador, Marc Comas‐Cufí et al.
1 citations
Cancers
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
article

Transperineal MRI-US Fusion-Guided Biopsy with Systematic Sampling for Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Implications Across PI-RADS

Ignacio Asiaín, Valèria Richart, R. Salvador, Marc Comas‐Cufí, Josep Puig, Leonardo Rodríguez‐Carunchio, Belinda Salinas, Meritxell Costa, M. Muní, Carlos Nicolau
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI-ultrasound (US) fusion-targeted biopsy have improved prostate cancer diagnosis, particularly for clinically significant disease. However, the added value of combining systematic biopsy with targeted biopsy remains debated. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI-US fusion-targeted and systematic transperineal biopsies in detecting prostate cancer and explore the correlation between PI-RADS score and histology. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively analyzed 356 patients with 452 MRI-detected lesions who underwent both MRI-US fusion-targeted and transperineal systematic biopsies between 2020 and 2023. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was defined as International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade ≥ 2. Diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy) were calculated for each technique using the combined result as a reference. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients under active surveillance. <b>Results</b>: Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 323 of 452 lesions (71%) and csPCa in 223 lesions (49%). Targeted biopsy demonstrated higher sensitivity (93.7%) and accuracy (79.9%) than systematic biopsy (85.7% sensitivity and 77.6% accuracy), although systematic biopsy provided slightly higher specificity. Systematic biopsy alone identified 8.2% of PCa cases missed by targeted biopsy and upgraded 9.9% of lesions to csPCa. csPCa detection increased with PI-RADS score (23% in PI-RADS 3 and 73% in PI-RADS 5). In active surveillance patients, csPCa was found in 65% of lesions. <b>Conclusions</b>: MRI-US fusion-targeted biopsy improves csPCa detection, but systematic biopsy remains valuable, especially for identifying additional or higher-grade disease. The combined approach provides an optimal diagnostic yield, supporting its continued use in both initial and repeat biopsy settings.

CancersVol. 17(17)
Universitat de Girona (ES), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.