Association of COVID-19 stimulus receipt and spending with family health

In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of U.S. government stimulus payments on family health during the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that receiving stimulus checks is associated with better family health and the effect of stimulus check receipt differs by income level. Additionally, we hypothesized that spending on immediate needs and paying off loans is associated with worse family health, and the effects of this spending differ by income level. Participants included 456 registered Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk) users, stratified by income, marital status, and parental status. We used the Family Health Scale - Long Form to measure family health constructs: social-emotional health, healthy lifestyle, health resources, and social support. For all statistical analyses, we used SAS Studio 3.8. We performed an exploratory factor analysis to determine six spending profiles: loans, savings, housing, household supplies, durable goods, and medical costs. After adjustment, our multiple linear regression model found that mean family health and social-emotional health scores were higher among individuals who received all three checks, but this did not differ by income category. Mean family health and social-emotional health were lower among individuals who spent more significant portions of their stimulus checks on housing, household supplies, and medical costs. Spending greater portions of checks on medical costs was associated with lower scores among every family health construct except family healthy lifestyle. Among mid-to-high-income participants, family health scores were significantly lower, with more spending on housing, household supplies, durable goods, and medical costs, with similar results in the subscale scores. The reduction of family health scores with spending on medical costs and durable goods were more pronounced among the mid-to-high-income group than the low-income group. Stimulus payments may be a promising family policy method for improving overall family health; however, more research should address the differences between income groups and government assistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328389
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of COVID-19 stimulus receipt and spending with family health

Evan L. Thacker, Michael Barnes, Emma M. Reese, Noah Lines
PLoS ONE
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Association of COVID-19 stimulus receipt and spending with family health

Evan L. Thacker, Michael Barnes, Emma M. Reese, Noah Lines
article en

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of U.S. government stimulus payments on family health during the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that receiving stimulus checks is associated with better family health and the effect of stimulus check receipt differs by income level. Additionally, we hypothesized that spending on immediate needs and paying off loans is associated with worse family health, and the effects of this spending differ by income level. Participants included 456 registered Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk) users, stratified by income, marital status, and parental status. We used the Family Health Scale - Long Form to measure family health constructs: social-emotional health, healthy lifestyle, health resources, and social support. For all statistical analyses, we used SAS Studio 3.8. We performed an exploratory factor analysis to determine six spending profiles: loans, savings, housing, household supplies, durable goods, and medical costs. After adjustment, our multiple linear regression model found that mean family health and social-emotional health scores were higher among individuals who received all three checks, but this did not differ by income category. Mean family health and social-emotional health were lower among individuals who spent more significant portions of their stimulus checks on housing, household supplies, and medical costs. Spending greater portions of checks on medical costs was associated with lower scores among every family health construct except family healthy lifestyle. Among mid-to-high-income participants, family health scores were significantly lower, with more spending on housing, household supplies, durable goods, and medical costs, with similar results in the subscale scores. The reduction of family health scores with spending on medical costs and durable goods were more pronounced among the mid-to-high-income group than the low-income group. Stimulus payments may be a promising family policy method for improving overall family health; however, more research should address the differences between income groups and government assistance.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(8)
Brigham Young University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.