Artificial intelligence-assisted prediction of critical factors governing pesticide adsorption by agricultural wastes in wastewater treatment

Agricultural waste-based adsorbents offer a sustainable, cost-effective solution for pesticide removal via adsorption. However, predicting removal efficiency under diverse experimental conditions remains challenging, especially when combining quantitative and qualitative variables. This study proposes a robust machine learning framework to predict pesticide removal efficiency using Random Forest (RF), Least-Square Boosting (LSBoost), and Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), each optimized through Bayesian Optimization with six acquisition functions. A curated dataset of 1,983 samples from the literature was used, comprising eight input variables: pesticide type, adsorbent type, initial concentration, contact time, pH, adsorbent to solvent ratio, pretreatment type, and adsorbent form. The target variable was pesticide removal efficiency (%). To determine optimal input combinations, 255 RF-based models (1–8 variables) were developed using cross-validation. RF consistently outperformed other models, achieving the highest predictive accuracy (R = 0.970, NSE = 0.937) and lowest error (NRMSE = 0.099, MAPE = 13.19%). LSBoost produced moderate accuracy, particularly with fewer variables, but showed sensitivity to input structure. ELM underperformed, especially with heterogeneous input features. Feature importance analysis revealed contact time, initial concentration, and adsorbent-to-solvent ratio as the most influential variables, whereas pretreatment type and adsorbent form had minimal impact. Pesticide-specific RF models showed that contact time, adsorbent-to-solvent ratio, and initial concentration were key for atrazine and chlorpyrifos removal, while adsorbent type was also critical for carbofuran. For diazinon, contact time, adsorbent type, and adsorbent-to-solvent ratio were the primary predictors. The findings of this study offer valuable guidance for designing efficient, sustainable pesticide removal systems using agro-waste-based adsorbents. • ML-based prediction of key factors in pesticide removal by agro-waste adsorbents. • Random Forest achieved the highest accuracy and lowest error among tested ML models. • Contact time, concentration, and adsorbent dose were the dominant predictive variables. • Model performance varied with pesticide type and input feature selection. • Study guides eco-friendly design of pesticide removal systems using ML.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of environmental chemical engineering
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.118849
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence-assisted prediction of critical factors governing pesticide adsorption by agricultural wastes in wastewater treatment

Ahasanul Karim, Seddik Khalloufi, Isa Ebtehaj, Hossein Bonakdari et al.
1 citations
Journal of environmental chemical engineering
Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
1.00
article

Artificial intelligence-assisted prediction of critical factors governing pesticide adsorption by agricultural wastes in wastewater treatment

Ahasanul Karim, Seddik Khalloufi, Isa Ebtehaj, Hossein Bonakdari, Masud Parvez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Agricultural waste-based adsorbents offer a sustainable, cost-effective solution for pesticide removal via adsorption. However, predicting removal efficiency under diverse experimental conditions remains challenging, especially when combining quantitative and qualitative variables. This study proposes a robust machine learning framework to predict pesticide removal efficiency using Random Forest (RF), Least-Square Boosting (LSBoost), and Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), each optimized through Bayesian Optimization with six acquisition functions. A curated dataset of 1,983 samples from the literature was used, comprising eight input variables: pesticide type, adsorbent type, initial concentration, contact time, pH, adsorbent to solvent ratio, pretreatment type, and adsorbent form. The target variable was pesticide removal efficiency (%). To determine optimal input combinations, 255 RF-based models (1–8 variables) were developed using cross-validation. RF consistently outperformed other models, achieving the highest predictive accuracy (R = 0.970, NSE = 0.937) and lowest error (NRMSE = 0.099, MAPE = 13.19%). LSBoost produced moderate accuracy, particularly with fewer variables, but showed sensitivity to input structure. ELM underperformed, especially with heterogeneous input features. Feature importance analysis revealed contact time, initial concentration, and adsorbent-to-solvent ratio as the most influential variables, whereas pretreatment type and adsorbent form had minimal impact. Pesticide-specific RF models showed that contact time, adsorbent-to-solvent ratio, and initial concentration were key for atrazine and chlorpyrifos removal, while adsorbent type was also critical for carbofuran. For diazinon, contact time, adsorbent type, and adsorbent-to-solvent ratio were the primary predictors. The findings of this study offer valuable guidance for designing efficient, sustainable pesticide removal systems using agro-waste-based adsorbents. • ML-based prediction of key factors in pesticide removal by agro-waste adsorbents. • Random Forest achieved the highest accuracy and lowest error among tested ML models. • Contact time, concentration, and adsorbent dose were the dominant predictive variables. • Model performance varied with pesticide type and input feature selection. • Study guides eco-friendly design of pesticide removal systems using ML.

Journal of environmental chemical engineeringVol. 13(5)
University of Ottawa (CA), Université Laval (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
1.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.