Drivers and barriers of AI adoption and use in scientific research

We study the early adoption and use of artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific research. Using a large dataset of publications from OpenAlex (all fields, up to 2024) and building on theories of scientific and technical human capital, we identify key factors that influence AI adoption. We find that early adopters were domain scientists embedded in AI-rich collaboration networks and affiliated with institutions with strong AI credentials. Access to high-performance computing (HPC) mattered only in a few scientific disciplines, such as biology and medical sciences. More recently, as tools like Large Language Models (LLMs) have diffused, AI has become more accessible, and institutional advantages appear to matter less. However, social capital—especially ties to AI-experienced collaborators and early-career researchers—remains a persistent driver of adoption. We discuss the implications for science policy and the organization of research in the age of AI. • Factors driving and hindering AI adoption in science. • AI adoption shaped by social, institutional, and individual factors. • Collaboration networks and team composition strongly predict adoption. • Access to computing resources is generally not a major barrier. • Institutional and technical factors matter less after LLMs emerge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124303
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drivers and barriers of AI adoption and use in scientific research

Moritz Müller, Pierre Pelletier, Stefano Bianchini
3 citations
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
article

Drivers and barriers of AI adoption and use in scientific research

Moritz Müller, Pierre Pelletier, Stefano Bianchini
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We study the early adoption and use of artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific research. Using a large dataset of publications from OpenAlex (all fields, up to 2024) and building on theories of scientific and technical human capital, we identify key factors that influence AI adoption. We find that early adopters were domain scientists embedded in AI-rich collaboration networks and affiliated with institutions with strong AI credentials. Access to high-performance computing (HPC) mattered only in a few scientific disciplines, such as biology and medical sciences. More recently, as tools like Large Language Models (LLMs) have diffused, AI has become more accessible, and institutional advantages appear to matter less. However, social capital—especially ties to AI-experienced collaborators and early-career researchers—remains a persistent driver of adoption. We discuss the implications for science policy and the organization of research in the age of AI. • Factors driving and hindering AI adoption in science. • AI adoption shaped by social, institutional, and individual factors. • Collaboration networks and team composition strongly predict adoption. • Access to computing resources is generally not a major barrier. • Institutional and technical factors matter less after LLMs emerge.

Technological Forecasting and Social ChangeVol. 220
Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée (FR), Université de Strasbourg (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.