Prohibición de persecución múltiple y procedimientos administrativos sancionatorios

The prohibition of multiple prosecutions prevents a person from being subjected to a second sanctioning proceeding for an act for which they have already been acquitted or definitively sanctioned. While the prevailing view recognizes that this protection may apply to administrative sanctioning proceedings, the specific features of such application have not been thoroughly examined. This article aims to analyze the application of the prohibition of multiple prosecutions in the context of administrative sanctioning proceedings, with particular reference to the financial and antitrust sectors. To this end, it examines the rationale underlying this protection, as well as the manner in which its application requirements should be assessed within the framework of such proceedings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Chilena de Derecho y Ciencia Política
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7770/rchdcp-v16n1-art479
Primary Topic
Legal processes and jurisprudence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prohibición de persecución múltiple y procedimientos administrativos sancionatorios

Javier Escobar Veas
Revista Chilena de Derecho y Ciencia Política
Legal processes and jurisprudence
article

Prohibición de persecución múltiple y procedimientos administrativos sancionatorios

Javier Escobar Veas
article en

Abstract

The prohibition of multiple prosecutions prevents a person from being subjected to a second sanctioning proceeding for an act for which they have already been acquitted or definitively sanctioned. While the prevailing view recognizes that this protection may apply to administrative sanctioning proceedings, the specific features of such application have not been thoroughly examined. This article aims to analyze the application of the prohibition of multiple prosecutions in the context of administrative sanctioning proceedings, with particular reference to the financial and antitrust sectors. To this end, it examines the rationale underlying this protection, as well as the manner in which its application requirements should be assessed within the framework of such proceedings.

Revista Chilena de Derecho y Ciencia PolíticaVol. 16(1)
Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Legal processes and jurisprudence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Prohibición de persecución múltiple y procedimientos administrativos sancionatorios — Javier Escobar Veas · Revista Chilena de Derecho y Ciencia Política (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS