Results of the <scp>ACCOuNT</scp> Trial: A Multi‐Institutional Prospective Pharmacogenomics Implementation Trial for African American Inpatients

Pharmacogenomics implementation efforts have increased over the last decade, but no published prospective pharmacogenomics trials have formally evaluated utility in underrepresented populations. We present final results from the ACCOuNT trial, a multi-institutional prospective study [NCT03225820] in which African American inpatients were genotyped and pharmacogenomic results made available via an integrated, scalable pharmacogenomics clinical decision support (PGx CDS) system to guide prescribing. We hypothesized that PGx CDS utilization would improve genomically concordant prescribing during inpatient admissions. We recruited 531 patients, of which 187 were readmitted (60.4% female, median age = 55 [range: 19-88], median readmissions/patient = 2 [range: 1-17]), resulting in 518 evaluable admissions during which the effect of available pharmacogenomic results was measured. In 50% of admissions, care teams utilized PGx CDS. 12% of inpatient prescriptions had pharmacogenomic annotations, with only 3.6% pharmacogenomically associated with increased caution ("discordant"); no PGx high-risk medications were prescribed. PGx CDS use by provider teams did not decrease genomically discordant prescribing (3.9% vs. 3.3% without PGx CDS use, P = 0.53). Nevertheless, inpatient care teams repeatedly consulted PGx CDS ostensibly to affirm genomically concordant prescriptions, as 48% of all admissions and 91% of discharges included pharmacogenomically annotated medications, mostly genomically concordant. Notably, timing of PGx CDS utilization correlated tightly with prescribing timing (correlation coefficient = 0.84, P < 0.05). In the first results of a multi-institutional, prospective pharmacogenomics trial focused on underrepresented patients, we found the relevance of currently actionable pharmacogenomics information for guiding inpatient prescribing to be modest; but observed frequent use of concordant pharmacogenomics to affirm prescribing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70024
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.56

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Results of the ACCOuNT Trial: A Multi‐Institutional Prospective Pharmacogenomics Implementation Trial for African American Inpatients

Kiang-Teck J Yeo, Kevin J. O’Leary, Peter H. O’Donnell, Minoli A. Perera et al.
1 citations
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
1.56
article

Results of the ACCOuNT Trial: A Multi‐Institutional Prospective Pharmacogenomics Implementation Trial for African American Inpatients

Kiang-Teck J Yeo, Kevin J. O’Leary, Peter H. O’Donnell, Minoli A. Perera, Gregory W. Ruhnke, Seth Hartman, Matthew Jack, Larry House, Anish Choksi, Randall W. Knoebel, Mark J. Ratain, Luke V. Rasmussen, Edith A. Nutescu, Huang Zhong, Tai C. Chen, James C. Lee, David Meltzer, David L. George
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Pharmacogenomics implementation efforts have increased over the last decade, but no published prospective pharmacogenomics trials have formally evaluated utility in underrepresented populations. We present final results from the ACCOuNT trial, a multi-institutional prospective study [NCT03225820] in which African American inpatients were genotyped and pharmacogenomic results made available via an integrated, scalable pharmacogenomics clinical decision support (PGx CDS) system to guide prescribing. We hypothesized that PGx CDS utilization would improve genomically concordant prescribing during inpatient admissions. We recruited 531 patients, of which 187 were readmitted (60.4% female, median age = 55 [range: 19-88], median readmissions/patient = 2 [range: 1-17]), resulting in 518 evaluable admissions during which the effect of available pharmacogenomic results was measured. In 50% of admissions, care teams utilized PGx CDS. 12% of inpatient prescriptions had pharmacogenomic annotations, with only 3.6% pharmacogenomically associated with increased caution ("discordant"); no PGx high-risk medications were prescribed. PGx CDS use by provider teams did not decrease genomically discordant prescribing (3.9% vs. 3.3% without PGx CDS use, P = 0.53). Nevertheless, inpatient care teams repeatedly consulted PGx CDS ostensibly to affirm genomically concordant prescriptions, as 48% of all admissions and 91% of discharges included pharmacogenomically annotated medications, mostly genomically concordant. Notably, timing of PGx CDS utilization correlated tightly with prescribing timing (correlation coefficient = 0.84, P < 0.05). In the first results of a multi-institutional, prospective pharmacogenomics trial focused on underrepresented patients, we found the relevance of currently actionable pharmacogenomics information for guiding inpatient prescribing to be modest; but observed frequent use of concordant pharmacogenomics to affirm prescribing.

Clinical Pharmacology & TherapeuticsVol. 119(1)
Northwestern University (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US), Northwestern Memorial Hospital (US), Northwestern Medicine (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
1.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.