Restrictive State Electoral Environments and the Health of Black Americans

ABSTRACT Objective The research tests the effect that restrictive state election laws have on the self‐reported health of Black Americans. Methods Initially, aggregate bivariate relationships are assessed as an exercise in theory building before moving to individual‐level survey data to test the association between a more restrictive state electoral environment and self‐reported health. We employ logistic regression to ascertain the predicted probability that individual respondents report they have either very good or excellent health. Results The results suggest a more restrictive electoral environment associates with lower self‐reported health for all survey respondents, but the association grows stronger for Black Americans. This is the case after controlling for other considerations that scholars routinely identify as influencing individual health outcomes. Conclusion The implication is that removing barriers to registering to vote and casting a ballot on Election Day, in the American states, would create a more evenhanded electoral system where all voices can equally influence the political decision‐making that promotes personal health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Quarterly
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70077
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restrictive State Electoral Environments and the Health of Black Americans

Scot Schraufnagel, Dawn Hunter, Robert Durbin, Gnora Mahs
Social Science Quarterly
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Restrictive State Electoral Environments and the Health of Black Americans

Scot Schraufnagel, Dawn Hunter, Robert Durbin, Gnora Mahs
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective The research tests the effect that restrictive state election laws have on the self‐reported health of Black Americans. Methods Initially, aggregate bivariate relationships are assessed as an exercise in theory building before moving to individual‐level survey data to test the association between a more restrictive state electoral environment and self‐reported health. We employ logistic regression to ascertain the predicted probability that individual respondents report they have either very good or excellent health. Results The results suggest a more restrictive electoral environment associates with lower self‐reported health for all survey respondents, but the association grows stronger for Black Americans. This is the case after controlling for other considerations that scholars routinely identify as influencing individual health outcomes. Conclusion The implication is that removing barriers to registering to vote and casting a ballot on Election Day, in the American states, would create a more evenhanded electoral system where all voices can equally influence the political decision‐making that promotes personal health.

Social Science QuarterlyVol. 106(5)
Northern Illinois University (US), Institute for Government (GB), St. Petersburg College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.