Life Cycle Assessments in hydrogen-based energy storage systems

Hydrogen is increasingly recognized as an element in the effort to decarbonize the energy sector. Within the development of large-scale supply chain, the storage phase emerges as a significant challenge. This study reviews Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) literature focused exclusively on hydrogen as an energy vector, aiming to identify areas for improvement, highlight effective solutions, and point out research gaps. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of hydrogen storage technologies from an environmental perspective. A systematic search was conducted in the SCOPUS database using a specific set of keywords, resulting in the identification of 30 relevant studies. These works explore hydrogen storage across different scales and applications, which were classified into five categories based on the type of storage application, most of them related to stationary use. The majority of the selected studies focus on storing hydrogen in compressed gas tanks. Notably, 33 % of the analyzed articles assess only greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and 10 % evaluate only two environmental impact categories, including GHGs. This reflects a limited understanding of broader environmental impacts, with a predominant focus on CO₂ eq emissions. When comparing different case studies, storage methods associated with the lowest emissions include metal hydrides and underground hydrogen storage. Another important observation is the trend of decreasing CO₂ eq emissions as the storage system scale increases. Future studies should adopt more comprehensive approaches by analyzing a wider range of hydrogen storage technologies and considering multiple environmental impact categories in LCA. Moreover, it is crucial to integrate environmental, economic, and social dimensions of sustainability, as multidimensional assessments are essential to support well-informed, balanced decisions that align with the sustainable development of hydrogen storage systems. • Life Cycle Assessment for hydrogen storage is reviewed. • Energy storage systems are studied across different scales. • Environmental impacts of hydrogen storage depend on the methods used on H 2 production. • Renewable energy systems show most impacts tied to construction phases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Energy Storage
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.118008
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life Cycle Assessments in hydrogen-based energy storage systems

Marcello Baricco, Darío Padovan, Alessandro Agostini, Giuseppe Pellegrini‐Masini et al.
8 citations
Journal of Energy Storage
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
5.46
article

Life Cycle Assessments in hydrogen-based energy storage systems

Marcello Baricco, Darío Padovan, Alessandro Agostini, Giuseppe Pellegrini‐Masini, Paola Rizzi, Claudio Carbone, Eduardo Alves, Jacopo Bindi, Francesca Garelli
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Hydrogen is increasingly recognized as an element in the effort to decarbonize the energy sector. Within the development of large-scale supply chain, the storage phase emerges as a significant challenge. This study reviews Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) literature focused exclusively on hydrogen as an energy vector, aiming to identify areas for improvement, highlight effective solutions, and point out research gaps. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of hydrogen storage technologies from an environmental perspective. A systematic search was conducted in the SCOPUS database using a specific set of keywords, resulting in the identification of 30 relevant studies. These works explore hydrogen storage across different scales and applications, which were classified into five categories based on the type of storage application, most of them related to stationary use. The majority of the selected studies focus on storing hydrogen in compressed gas tanks. Notably, 33 % of the analyzed articles assess only greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and 10 % evaluate only two environmental impact categories, including GHGs. This reflects a limited understanding of broader environmental impacts, with a predominant focus on CO₂ eq emissions. When comparing different case studies, storage methods associated with the lowest emissions include metal hydrides and underground hydrogen storage. Another important observation is the trend of decreasing CO₂ eq emissions as the storage system scale increases. Future studies should adopt more comprehensive approaches by analyzing a wider range of hydrogen storage technologies and considering multiple environmental impact categories in LCA. Moreover, it is crucial to integrate environmental, economic, and social dimensions of sustainability, as multidimensional assessments are essential to support well-informed, balanced decisions that align with the sustainable development of hydrogen storage systems. • Life Cycle Assessment for hydrogen storage is reviewed. • Energy storage systems are studied across different scales. • Environmental impacts of hydrogen storage depend on the methods used on H 2 production. • Renewable energy systems show most impacts tied to construction phases.

Journal of Energy StorageVol. 133
National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (IT), Luigi Einaudi Foundation (IT), University of Turin (IT)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
5.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.