Observing interoperability: a behavioural framework and analysis of multi-agency interactions in the UK emergency services

• A behavioural framework measuring interoperability in UK emergency service meetings. • Markers of trust, identity, goals, communication and flexibility recorded. • Video data show services often self-segregate, challenging multi-agency cooperation. • Good communication may boost intra-service cohesion but limit cross-service work. • Goals-focussed discussions are associated with broader cross-service interaction. • Shared identity may reduce self-segregation but not enhance verbal collaboration. In the context of UK Emergency Management, interoperability among the emergency services is essential for effective response to disasters. This study employs qualitative and quantitative observational methods, to introduce a behavioural codebook that measures physical and psychological manifestations of interoperability in cross-services operational meetings, involving the police, fire and ambulance services. Applying this coding framework, we measure the frequency of interoperability behaviour in team meetings—including markers of trust, identification, goals, communication, and flexibility (Power et al., 2024a). Through a series of multiple logistic regressions, we determine the impact that interoperability behaviour has on subsequent team interactions. Analysis of 5 high quality videos and 102 video stills showed a notable tendency for physical clustering within service units. Effective communication was the most frequently observed component of interoperability, yet it also reinforced intra-group siloed interactions. Goals were frequently discussed, and these mentions were associated with a decreased likelihood of individuals paying attention to, speaking to, and being openly receptive to members of their own service unit over others. Conversely, markers of shared identity were associated with increased cross-service physical clustering—though this did not significantly increase cross-service verbal communication or open gesturing. These results underscore the complexity of achieving genuine interoperability and the need for targeted strategies that address both operational and psychological barriers. Our study contributes to the development of practical measures for assessing and enhancing multi-agency interoperability, essential for improving emergency response coordination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety Science
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106947
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Observing interoperability: a behavioural framework and analysis of multi-agency interactions in the UK emergency services

Richard Philpot, Mark Levine, Nicola Power, Charlotte Betts et al.
Safety Science
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Observing interoperability: a behavioural framework and analysis of multi-agency interactions in the UK emergency services

Richard Philpot, Mark Levine, Nicola Power, Charlotte Betts, Eloise Duck
article en

Abstract

• A behavioural framework measuring interoperability in UK emergency service meetings. • Markers of trust, identity, goals, communication and flexibility recorded. • Video data show services often self-segregate, challenging multi-agency cooperation. • Good communication may boost intra-service cohesion but limit cross-service work. • Goals-focussed discussions are associated with broader cross-service interaction. • Shared identity may reduce self-segregation but not enhance verbal collaboration. In the context of UK Emergency Management, interoperability among the emergency services is essential for effective response to disasters. This study employs qualitative and quantitative observational methods, to introduce a behavioural codebook that measures physical and psychological manifestations of interoperability in cross-services operational meetings, involving the police, fire and ambulance services. Applying this coding framework, we measure the frequency of interoperability behaviour in team meetings—including markers of trust, identification, goals, communication, and flexibility (Power et al., 2024a). Through a series of multiple logistic regressions, we determine the impact that interoperability behaviour has on subsequent team interactions. Analysis of 5 high quality videos and 102 video stills showed a notable tendency for physical clustering within service units. Effective communication was the most frequently observed component of interoperability, yet it also reinforced intra-group siloed interactions. Goals were frequently discussed, and these mentions were associated with a decreased likelihood of individuals paying attention to, speaking to, and being openly receptive to members of their own service unit over others. Conversely, markers of shared identity were associated with increased cross-service physical clustering—though this did not significantly increase cross-service verbal communication or open gesturing. These results underscore the complexity of achieving genuine interoperability and the need for targeted strategies that address both operational and psychological barriers. Our study contributes to the development of practical measures for assessing and enhancing multi-agency interoperability, essential for improving emergency response coordination.

Safety ScienceVol. 191
University of Liverpool (GB), Lancaster University (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.