Exploring mobility justice: The interplay between mobility behaviour and public participation

• Individuals' mobility and public participation profiles are intercorrelated. • People with previous participation experience more willing to participate. • People with participation experience more welcoming to emerging mobility. • Usage with shared and active modes correlates with willingness to participate. • Risk of increased distributive and deliberative (in)justice by unequal access. The sustainable transformation of the mobility sector suggests promoting multimodal mobility behaviour, integrating public transport with active (and shared) modes of transportation. Equally important is the role of public participation in shaping these mobility solutions. This exploratory study examines the empirical interplay between involvement in participatory processes, socio-demographics, and individual mobility behaviour, framed through the lens of mobility justice, encompassing distributive, deliberative, and procedural justice. The study addresses three key questions: (1) How does individual involvement in public participation relate to mobility profiles? (2) What inter-individual differences emerge based on sociodemographic and vulnerability factors? (3) What are the implications from a mobility justice perspective? Using survey data from 2,506 respondents, the analysis employs statistical testing and regression modelling to identify determinants of mobility profiles in terms of travel frequency by different modes of transport. The findings reveal that frequent users of shared mobility are more likely to engage in participation processes, both historically and in the future. Furthermore, prior participation significantly predicts future willingness to engage. The results lead to two critical conclusions: (a) frequent shared mobility users' participation aligns with the idea that 'sharing is caring', and (b) the unequal representation of mobility profiles in participatory formats risks perpetuating and exacerbating mobility injustices. Researchers and practitioners must account for diverse forms of vulnerability to harness the democratic and sustainable potential of participatory processes. This approach ensures inclusive expertise from citizens while avoiding the overrepresentation of already privileged groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Urban Mobility
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100144
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring mobility justice: The interplay between mobility behaviour and public participation

Julia Hansel, Anna Grigolon, Roxani Gkavra, Kelt Garritsen
3 citations
Journal of Urban Mobility
Urban Transport and Accessibility
6.53
article

Exploring mobility justice: The interplay between mobility behaviour and public participation

Julia Hansel, Anna Grigolon, Roxani Gkavra, Kelt Garritsen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Individuals' mobility and public participation profiles are intercorrelated. • People with previous participation experience more willing to participate. • People with participation experience more welcoming to emerging mobility. • Usage with shared and active modes correlates with willingness to participate. • Risk of increased distributive and deliberative (in)justice by unequal access. The sustainable transformation of the mobility sector suggests promoting multimodal mobility behaviour, integrating public transport with active (and shared) modes of transportation. Equally important is the role of public participation in shaping these mobility solutions. This exploratory study examines the empirical interplay between involvement in participatory processes, socio-demographics, and individual mobility behaviour, framed through the lens of mobility justice, encompassing distributive, deliberative, and procedural justice. The study addresses three key questions: (1) How does individual involvement in public participation relate to mobility profiles? (2) What inter-individual differences emerge based on sociodemographic and vulnerability factors? (3) What are the implications from a mobility justice perspective? Using survey data from 2,506 respondents, the analysis employs statistical testing and regression modelling to identify determinants of mobility profiles in terms of travel frequency by different modes of transport. The findings reveal that frequent users of shared mobility are more likely to engage in participation processes, both historically and in the future. Furthermore, prior participation significantly predicts future willingness to engage. The results lead to two critical conclusions: (a) frequent shared mobility users' participation aligns with the idea that 'sharing is caring', and (b) the unequal representation of mobility profiles in participatory formats risks perpetuating and exacerbating mobility injustices. Researchers and practitioners must account for diverse forms of vulnerability to harness the democratic and sustainable potential of participatory processes. This approach ensures inclusive expertise from citizens while avoiding the overrepresentation of already privileged groups.

Journal of Urban MobilityVol. 8
University of Münster (DE), FH Münster University of Applied Sciences (DE), BOKU University (AT), University of Twente (NL)
Joint Programming Initiative Urban Europe, University of Twente, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
6.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.