Practice of percutaneous coronary interventions in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (based on the CONTRAST registry data)

Aim. To assess real-world practice in the use of invasive diagnostic and treatment methods in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) within the registry of the regional vascular centre. Material and methods. The study included 136 patients consecutively admitted on an emergency basis to the vascular center in Sergiyev Posad between October 2018 and March 2019 with a diagnosis of NSTE-ACS. The mean age was 63±11 years, and 61% were male. Results. All patients underwent coronary angiography (CAG) as soon as possible after hospital admission (less than 2 hours). None of the patients had absolute contraindications for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). All 136 patients were divided into 3 groups based on the chosen invasive treatment strategy: patients who did not undergo PCI at the inpatient stage of treatment and with long-term follow-up — 69 people (50.7%; group 1); patients who underwent PCI during the current hospitalisation — 50 people (36.8%; group 2); patients who underwent delayed PCI after the current hospitalisation — 17 people (12.5%; group 3). The decision to perform PCI was not influenced by the disease patterns or the GRACE risk score. The results of the CAG showed that patients in group 3 had three-vessel coronary artery disease significantly more often than in groups 1 and 2 (59% vs 22% and 34%, p=0.001). Regression analysis showed that the detection of damage to only one coronary artery significantly increased the likelihood of PCI. This probability progressively decreased as the extent of CAD increased. Conclusion. In the regional vascular centre, in-hospital PCI was performed in only 36% of patients diagnosed with NSTE-ACS. When deciding on PCI, physicians were primarily guided not by the degree of risk of cardiovascular complications, as required by clinical guidelines, but rather by the technical feasibility and safety of the procedure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2025-3196
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practice of percutaneous coronary interventions in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (based on the CONTRAST registry data)

A. V. Zagrebelnyi, S. Yu. Martsevich, Н. П. Кутишенко, E. P. Кalaydzhyan et al.
Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
article

Practice of percutaneous coronary interventions in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (based on the CONTRAST registry data)

A. V. Zagrebelnyi, S. Yu. Martsevich, Н. П. Кутишенко, E. P. Кalaydzhyan, Oksana M. Drapkina, A G Borodin
article en

Abstract

Aim. To assess real-world practice in the use of invasive diagnostic and treatment methods in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) within the registry of the regional vascular centre. Material and methods. The study included 136 patients consecutively admitted on an emergency basis to the vascular center in Sergiyev Posad between October 2018 and March 2019 with a diagnosis of NSTE-ACS. The mean age was 63±11 years, and 61% were male. Results. All patients underwent coronary angiography (CAG) as soon as possible after hospital admission (less than 2 hours). None of the patients had absolute contraindications for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). All 136 patients were divided into 3 groups based on the chosen invasive treatment strategy: patients who did not undergo PCI at the inpatient stage of treatment and with long-term follow-up — 69 people (50.7%; group 1); patients who underwent PCI during the current hospitalisation — 50 people (36.8%; group 2); patients who underwent delayed PCI after the current hospitalisation — 17 people (12.5%; group 3). The decision to perform PCI was not influenced by the disease patterns or the GRACE risk score. The results of the CAG showed that patients in group 3 had three-vessel coronary artery disease significantly more often than in groups 1 and 2 (59% vs 22% and 34%, p=0.001). Regression analysis showed that the detection of damage to only one coronary artery significantly increased the likelihood of PCI. This probability progressively decreased as the extent of CAD increased. Conclusion. In the regional vascular centre, in-hospital PCI was performed in only 36% of patients diagnosed with NSTE-ACS. When deciding on PCI, physicians were primarily guided not by the degree of risk of cardiovascular complications, as required by clinical guidelines, but rather by the technical feasibility and safety of the procedure.

Rational Pharmacotherapy in CardiologyVol. 21(3)
Sergiyev Posad Humanitarian Institute (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.