Using Implementation Science to Advance Hearing Health Equity in Older Adults

Background/Objectives: Hearing loss is highly prevalent among the 1.2 million older adults who live in Senior Living Communities (SLCs). Under-detection of hearing loss and under-use of hearing devices among residents of SLCs is a significant healthcare disparity, which places older adults at an increased risk for dementia, falls, and depression. Our long-term objective is to improve the hearing health, emotional well-being, and quality-of-life of older adults living in SLCs by implementing hearing healthcare into standard clinical care. Methods: We focused on the first two of the four interrelated phases of implementation science: exploration and initiation. We partnered with the largest SLC in Indiana and onboarded three of their communities. Each of these communities provide four levels of care, and residents vary across Social Determinants of Health (SDoH), allowing our team to compare hearing health outcomes as a function of residents’ physical/cognitive abilities and SDoH. Results: As part of the exploration phase, we identified five barriers to hearing healthcare in SLCs: 1) hearing health literacy in the care staff and residents, 2) poor management of hearing devices, 3) poor management of cerumen – ear hygiene – which hinders access to sound, 4) underuse of effective screening tools, and 5) lack of connections to an audiologist and neurotologist. As part of the initiation phase, we collaborated with community stakeholders to create the infrastructure for screening, referring, & implementation of clinical healthcare. Conclusions/Implications: Implementation science is applying an already known evidence-based practice to a particular problem; in this case, we anticipate that providing effective screening tools, management of cerumen, and access to an audiologist and neurotologist will improve the hearing health, emotional well-being, & quality-of-life in older adults living in SLCs. Our research program will continue to develop, test, and refine our implementation strategies to achieve equity in hearing health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of IMPRS
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18060/29083
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Implementation Science to Advance Hearing Health Equity in Older Adults

Rick F. Nelson, Kaitlyn O’Donnell, Irina Castellanos
Proceedings of IMPRS
Noise Effects and Management
article

Using Implementation Science to Advance Hearing Health Equity in Older Adults

Rick F. Nelson, Kaitlyn O’Donnell, Irina Castellanos
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Hearing loss is highly prevalent among the 1.2 million older adults who live in Senior Living Communities (SLCs). Under-detection of hearing loss and under-use of hearing devices among residents of SLCs is a significant healthcare disparity, which places older adults at an increased risk for dementia, falls, and depression. Our long-term objective is to improve the hearing health, emotional well-being, and quality-of-life of older adults living in SLCs by implementing hearing healthcare into standard clinical care. Methods: We focused on the first two of the four interrelated phases of implementation science: exploration and initiation. We partnered with the largest SLC in Indiana and onboarded three of their communities. Each of these communities provide four levels of care, and residents vary across Social Determinants of Health (SDoH), allowing our team to compare hearing health outcomes as a function of residents’ physical/cognitive abilities and SDoH. Results: As part of the exploration phase, we identified five barriers to hearing healthcare in SLCs: 1) hearing health literacy in the care staff and residents, 2) poor management of hearing devices, 3) poor management of cerumen – ear hygiene – which hinders access to sound, 4) underuse of effective screening tools, and 5) lack of connections to an audiologist and neurotologist. As part of the initiation phase, we collaborated with community stakeholders to create the infrastructure for screening, referring, & implementation of clinical healthcare. Conclusions/Implications: Implementation science is applying an already known evidence-based practice to a particular problem; in this case, we anticipate that providing effective screening tools, management of cerumen, and access to an audiologist and neurotologist will improve the hearing health, emotional well-being, & quality-of-life in older adults living in SLCs. Our research program will continue to develop, test, and refine our implementation strategies to achieve equity in hearing health outcomes.

Proceedings of IMPRSVol. 7(1)
University School (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.