Assessing a Community-based, Group Care Program Adapted for Pregnant and Parenting Adolescents in Western Kenya: An Acceptability and Feasibility Study

Background: An estimated 21 million adolescent pregnancies occur worldwide, predominantly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). These pregnancies often result in poor health outcomes due to low health literacy and limited healthcare interaction. Furthermore, many adolescent parents face disproportionate stigma and are unable to complete their education or seek employment due to parenting obligations. The Chamas for Change program, an existing community-based group care program in Kenya targeted to adult mothers, shows promise in improving maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) outcomes in adolescents. This study evaluates the acceptability and feasibility of an adapted Chamas model tailored for pregnant and parenting adolescents. Methods: This mixed-methods study investigated the acceptability and feasibility of an adapted Chamas program for pregnant adolescents in rural Western Kenya. Likert scale surveys (ranging 1-5, 5 = “completely agree”) were conducted at baseline and endline to quantitively assess acceptability of the program. Program attendance, barriers to attendance, and intention to re-enroll were used to assess feasibility. Two Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) conducted at endline were analyzed through a thematic framework to qualitatively assess acceptability and feasibility. Results: Over the course of the study, 85% of participants had attended at least half of the adapted program sessions. At endline, 99% of adolescents reported the program is acceptable and 95% reported it is feasible (score ≥ 4 on the Likert scale). Additionally, 99% indicated they would re-enroll in the program for another cycle and 71% would attend even if no transportation and snacks are offered. Through thematic analysis of FGDs, strong themes of greater peer support and health literacy were noted. Conclusion and Potential Impact: The adolescent Chamas pilot demonstrated strong acceptability and feasibility, with MNCH outcomes being equivalent or better with the intervention. As such, there is potential to scale-up and expand the adapted Chamas program.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of IMPRS
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18060/29066
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing a Community-based, Group Care Program Adapted for Pregnant and Parenting Adolescents in Western Kenya: An Acceptability and Feasibility Study

Michael Scanlon, Edith Apondi, Justus Elung’at, Anjellah Jumah et al.
Proceedings of IMPRS
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

Assessing a Community-based, Group Care Program Adapted for Pregnant and Parenting Adolescents in Western Kenya: An Acceptability and Feasibility Study

Michael Scanlon, Edith Apondi, Justus Elung’at, Anjellah Jumah, Gertrude Anusu, Laura J. Ruhl, Julie Thorne, Lauren Y. Maldonado, Julia Songok, Om Dalal, Astrid Chrisoffersen-Deb, Maureen Chepkoech, Joan Keter
article en

Abstract

Background: An estimated 21 million adolescent pregnancies occur worldwide, predominantly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). These pregnancies often result in poor health outcomes due to low health literacy and limited healthcare interaction. Furthermore, many adolescent parents face disproportionate stigma and are unable to complete their education or seek employment due to parenting obligations. The Chamas for Change program, an existing community-based group care program in Kenya targeted to adult mothers, shows promise in improving maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) outcomes in adolescents. This study evaluates the acceptability and feasibility of an adapted Chamas model tailored for pregnant and parenting adolescents. Methods: This mixed-methods study investigated the acceptability and feasibility of an adapted Chamas program for pregnant adolescents in rural Western Kenya. Likert scale surveys (ranging 1-5, 5 = “completely agree”) were conducted at baseline and endline to quantitively assess acceptability of the program. Program attendance, barriers to attendance, and intention to re-enroll were used to assess feasibility. Two Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) conducted at endline were analyzed through a thematic framework to qualitatively assess acceptability and feasibility. Results: Over the course of the study, 85% of participants had attended at least half of the adapted program sessions. At endline, 99% of adolescents reported the program is acceptable and 95% reported it is feasible (score ≥ 4 on the Likert scale). Additionally, 99% indicated they would re-enroll in the program for another cycle and 71% would attend even if no transportation and snacks are offered. Through thematic analysis of FGDs, strong themes of greater peer support and health literacy were noted. Conclusion and Potential Impact: The adolescent Chamas pilot demonstrated strong acceptability and feasibility, with MNCH outcomes being equivalent or better with the intervention. As such, there is potential to scale-up and expand the adapted Chamas program.

Proceedings of IMPRSVol. 7(1)
Massachusetts General Hospital (US), University School (US), AMPATH (KE), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.