Effects of Inhaled Tobacco and Cannabis Co-Use on Respiratory Health and Tobacco Cessation: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement

<b>Background:</b> Tobacco and cannabis are among the most widely used substances globally, and rates of co-use are on the rise. Understanding the impact of inhaled tobacco-cannabis co-use on health outcomes and tobacco cessation is critical for guiding patients and clinicians. <b>Objectives:</b> To summarize the existing evidence, identify knowledge gaps, and prioritize research questions related to effects of inhaled tobacco-cannabis co-use on tobacco cessation and lung health. <b>Methods:</b> A multidisciplinary committee was convened to review the evidence, identify knowledge gaps, and develop research questions in four priority research areas: <i>1</i>) common data elements and terminology, <i>2</i>) patterns and prevalence of co-use, <i>3</i>) impact of co-use on tobacco cessation, and <i>4</i>) effects of co-use on lung health. A modified Delphi process was conducted in three rounds to reach consensus on prioritizing research questions. <b>Results:</b> The evidence reviewed by the expert panel in four priority research areas yielded the following gaps in the literature with high priority to address with future research: <i>1</i>) lack of consensus on terminology and recommended co-use data elements, <i>2</i>) limited research on co-use and tobacco-related disparities, <i>3</i>) insufficient evidence on how cannabis use affects tobacco cessation, and <i>4</i>) alarming yet inconsistent findings on the effects of co-use on lung health. <b>Conclusions:</b> This statement outlines and guides a research agenda on the effects of inhaled tobacco-cannabis co-use on tobacco cessation and lung health. Consensus-driven recommendations include adopting harmonized terms and minimum data elements, studying the prevalence of co-use among populations experiencing tobacco-related disparities, evaluating the impact of co-use on tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies, and assessing the effects of co-use on the development and progression of lung diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202507-1792st
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Public Health and Nutrition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Inhaled Tobacco and Cannabis Co-Use on Respiratory Health and Tobacco Cessation: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement

Danielle M. Smith, Erin A. McClure, Andrea H. Weinberger, Hasmeena Kathuria et al.
2 citations
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Public Health and Nutrition
6.99
article

Effects of Inhaled Tobacco and Cannabis Co-Use on Respiratory Health and Tobacco Cessation: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement

Danielle M. Smith, Erin A. McClure, Andrea H. Weinberger, Hasmeena Kathuria, Frank T. Leone, LaTrice Montgomery, Gideon St. Helen, Rachel A. Rabin, Tom P. Freeman, Anne C. Melzer, Dustin C. Lee, Robin J. Mermelstein, Ellen Lyda Burnham, Megan E. Piper, Laura E. Crotty Alexander, Adam Edward Lang, Panagis Galiatsatos
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Tobacco and cannabis are among the most widely used substances globally, and rates of co-use are on the rise. Understanding the impact of inhaled tobacco-cannabis co-use on health outcomes and tobacco cessation is critical for guiding patients and clinicians. <b>Objectives:</b> To summarize the existing evidence, identify knowledge gaps, and prioritize research questions related to effects of inhaled tobacco-cannabis co-use on tobacco cessation and lung health. <b>Methods:</b> A multidisciplinary committee was convened to review the evidence, identify knowledge gaps, and develop research questions in four priority research areas: <i>1</i>) common data elements and terminology, <i>2</i>) patterns and prevalence of co-use, <i>3</i>) impact of co-use on tobacco cessation, and <i>4</i>) effects of co-use on lung health. A modified Delphi process was conducted in three rounds to reach consensus on prioritizing research questions. <b>Results:</b> The evidence reviewed by the expert panel in four priority research areas yielded the following gaps in the literature with high priority to address with future research: <i>1</i>) lack of consensus on terminology and recommended co-use data elements, <i>2</i>) limited research on co-use and tobacco-related disparities, <i>3</i>) insufficient evidence on how cannabis use affects tobacco cessation, and <i>4</i>) alarming yet inconsistent findings on the effects of co-use on lung health. <b>Conclusions:</b> This statement outlines and guides a research agenda on the effects of inhaled tobacco-cannabis co-use on tobacco cessation and lung health. Consensus-driven recommendations include adopting harmonized terms and minimum data elements, studying the prevalence of co-use among populations experiencing tobacco-related disparities, evaluating the impact of co-use on tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies, and assessing the effects of co-use on the development and progression of lung diseases.

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineVol. 211(11)
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), San Francisco General Hospital (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), University of San Diego (US), Yeshiva University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), University of California San Diego (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Behavioral Pharma (United States) (US), VA San Diego Healthcare System (US), Minneapolis VA Health Care System (US), James E. Van Zandt VA Medical Center (US), Wisconsin Division of Public Health (US), McGill University (CA), University of Bath (GB), University of Cincinnati (US), Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Public Health and Nutrition
6.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.