Urban wastewater treatment plants as resource hubs: evaluating circularity and sustainability of nutrient recovery and water reuse

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are evolving from pollution control facilities into resource recovery hubs, aligning with circular economy principles. However, assessing their transition requires robust methodologies that integrate environmental, economic, and circularity dimensions. This study aims to evaluate the sustainability and circularity performance of a WWTP in Cyprus upgraded with additional treatment stages to recover nutrient-rich sludge for fertilizer and treated water for irrigation. To achieve this, a combined methodological framework was applied, incorporating standardized Circularity Assessment (based on ISO 59,004), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and Life Cycle Costing (LCC). Circularity was assessed using a dual-indicator approach: "resource flow indicators" (covering material, energy, and economic flows) and "circular actions indicators" (capturing process optimization, repurposing, cascading, and regeneration). Environmental and economic impacts were quantified using LCA and LCC, respectively, while sensitivity analyses explored the effects of renewable energy integration and process simplification. Results show that while the upgraded WWTP enhances circularity through increased resource recovery and high-value product generation, it also incurs higher environmental impacts and operational costs due to energy-intensive technologies (distillation, reverse osmosis, and nanofiltration), increasing the impacts in values that can achieve +60 % in some impact categories. Sensitivity scenarios demonstrated that reducing energy demand and increasing renewable energy use can improve sustainability outcomes, with the higher average impact reduction achieving -20 %, though often at the expense of circularity performance. The study highlights the trade-offs between maximizing resource recovery and minimizing environmental and economic burdens, emphasizing the need for optimized process design and supportive policy frameworks to enable WWTPs to function as effective circular economy enablers. The findings show that advanced treatment technologies enhance circularity through increased resource recovery, but also entail elevated energy demands and limited economic viability. While frameworks like ISO 59,004 support multidimensional assessment, further methodological development is needed to guide sustainable decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Research
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.124406
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Urban wastewater treatment plants as resource hubs: evaluating circularity and sustainability of nutrient recovery and water reuse

Daniel F. C. Dias, Evina Katsou, J. M. C. R. Ribeiro, Ana Arias et al.
7 citations
Water Research
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
6.98
article

Urban wastewater treatment plants as resource hubs: evaluating circularity and sustainability of nutrient recovery and water reuse

Daniel F. C. Dias, Evina Katsou, J. M. C. R. Ribeiro, Ana Arias, Marı́a Teresa Moreira, Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis, Maria Kyriazi, D. Renfrew, Maria Avramidi
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are evolving from pollution control facilities into resource recovery hubs, aligning with circular economy principles. However, assessing their transition requires robust methodologies that integrate environmental, economic, and circularity dimensions. This study aims to evaluate the sustainability and circularity performance of a WWTP in Cyprus upgraded with additional treatment stages to recover nutrient-rich sludge for fertilizer and treated water for irrigation. To achieve this, a combined methodological framework was applied, incorporating standardized Circularity Assessment (based on ISO 59,004), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and Life Cycle Costing (LCC). Circularity was assessed using a dual-indicator approach: "resource flow indicators" (covering material, energy, and economic flows) and "circular actions indicators" (capturing process optimization, repurposing, cascading, and regeneration). Environmental and economic impacts were quantified using LCA and LCC, respectively, while sensitivity analyses explored the effects of renewable energy integration and process simplification. Results show that while the upgraded WWTP enhances circularity through increased resource recovery and high-value product generation, it also incurs higher environmental impacts and operational costs due to energy-intensive technologies (distillation, reverse osmosis, and nanofiltration), increasing the impacts in values that can achieve +60 % in some impact categories. Sensitivity scenarios demonstrated that reducing energy demand and increasing renewable energy use can improve sustainability outcomes, with the higher average impact reduction achieving -20 %, though often at the expense of circularity performance. The study highlights the trade-offs between maximizing resource recovery and minimizing environmental and economic burdens, emphasizing the need for optimized process design and supportive policy frameworks to enable WWTPs to function as effective circular economy enablers. The findings show that advanced treatment technologies enhance circularity through increased resource recovery, but also entail elevated energy demands and limited economic viability. While frameworks like ISO 59,004 support multidimensional assessment, further methodological development is needed to guide sustainable decision-making.

Water ResearchVol. 287(Pt B)
National Technical University of Athens (GR), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
6.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.