Variation in a microbial mutualist has transcriptional and phenotypic consequences for host–parasite interactions

Abstract Strains of microbial symbionts often vary in their effect on their host. However, little is known about how the genetic variation in microbial symbiont populations impacts host interactions with other co‐colonizing microbes. We investigated how different strains of nitrogen‐fixing rhizobial bacteria affect their host plant's response to parasitic root‐knot nematodes in the legume Medicago truncatula . Using dual RNA‐Seq of the root organs harbouring rhizobia or nematodes, we identified genes from the plant host, rhizobia and nematode whose expression differed between parasite‐infected and ‐uninfected plants, and between plants inoculated with different rhizobial strains. At the site of host–parasite interactions (in nematode galls), hundreds of host genes and a few nematode genes differed in expression between host plants inoculated with different rhizobia strains. At the site of host–mutualist interactions (in rhizobia nodules), hundreds of host genes and a few rhizobial genes responded to parasite infection. The vast majority of parasite‐induced changes in host gene expression depended on the resident rhizobia strain. We additionally observed differences in parasite load and in some root architecture traits between plants inoculated with different rhizobia strains, showing that genetic variation in a mutualistic symbiont impacted parasite colonization. The transcriptomic and phenotypic differences we observed suggest that microbial indirect genetic effects play an underappreciated role in their host's interactions with other co‐colonizing microorganisms. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Functional Ecology
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.70143
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variation in a microbial mutualist has transcriptional and phenotypic consequences for host–parasite interactions

John R. Stinchcombe, Emile Gluck‐Thaler, Corlett W. Wood, Eunnuri Yi et al.
1 citations
Functional Ecology
Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
1.67
article

Variation in a microbial mutualist has transcriptional and phenotypic consequences for host–parasite interactions

John R. Stinchcombe, Emile Gluck‐Thaler, Corlett W. Wood, Eunnuri Yi, Addison D. Buxton‐Martin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Strains of microbial symbionts often vary in their effect on their host. However, little is known about how the genetic variation in microbial symbiont populations impacts host interactions with other co‐colonizing microbes. We investigated how different strains of nitrogen‐fixing rhizobial bacteria affect their host plant's response to parasitic root‐knot nematodes in the legume Medicago truncatula . Using dual RNA‐Seq of the root organs harbouring rhizobia or nematodes, we identified genes from the plant host, rhizobia and nematode whose expression differed between parasite‐infected and ‐uninfected plants, and between plants inoculated with different rhizobial strains. At the site of host–parasite interactions (in nematode galls), hundreds of host genes and a few nematode genes differed in expression between host plants inoculated with different rhizobia strains. At the site of host–mutualist interactions (in rhizobia nodules), hundreds of host genes and a few rhizobial genes responded to parasite infection. The vast majority of parasite‐induced changes in host gene expression depended on the resident rhizobia strain. We additionally observed differences in parasite load and in some root architecture traits between plants inoculated with different rhizobia strains, showing that genetic variation in a mutualistic symbiont impacted parasite colonization. The transcriptomic and phenotypic differences we observed suggest that microbial indirect genetic effects play an underappreciated role in their host's interactions with other co‐colonizing microorganisms. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Functional EcologyVol. 39(10)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Toronto (CA), Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Division of Environmental Biology
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.