Mapping Critical Thinking Skills through Newman’s Error Analysis in Secondary Students’ Problem-Solving

Mathematics plays a crucial role in fostering students’ logical, critical, and analytical thinking skills. However, many students still face challenges in understanding and applying mathematical concepts. This study aims to map students' critical thinking skills through an analysis of student errors in solving problems involving systems of linear equations in three variables using Newman Error Analysis (NEA). The research was conducted using a qualitative descriptive approach, supported by written tests and interviews. The research sample was 33 eleventh-grade high school students in Majalengka Regency, West Java. The findings revealed that while no errors occurred at the reading stage, 48% of students made comprehension errors, 57% made transformation errors, 66% experienced process skill errors, and 82% committed encoding errors. The most dominant errors were encoding errors, reflecting weaknesses in the aspects of evaluating evidence and drawing conclusions. Most encoding errors were influenced by students' lack of confidence and learning motivation. These results suggest that difficulties in earlier stages of problem-solving significantly affect students’ ability to arrive at correct final answers. The study emphasizes the importance of strengthening students’ procedural fluency and supporting their cognitive processes to improve mathematical problem-solving performance. Keywords: contextual, critical thinking skills, Newman’s error analysis, three-variable linear equation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Published
2025-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa.v26i3.pp1464-1478
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping Critical Thinking Skills through Newman’s Error Analysis in Secondary Students’ Problem-Solving

Nia Kania, Dewi Damayanti Hariri
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Mapping Critical Thinking Skills through Newman’s Error Analysis in Secondary Students’ Problem-Solving

Nia Kania, Dewi Damayanti Hariri
article en

Abstract

Mathematics plays a crucial role in fostering students’ logical, critical, and analytical thinking skills. However, many students still face challenges in understanding and applying mathematical concepts. This study aims to map students' critical thinking skills through an analysis of student errors in solving problems involving systems of linear equations in three variables using Newman Error Analysis (NEA). The research was conducted using a qualitative descriptive approach, supported by written tests and interviews. The research sample was 33 eleventh-grade high school students in Majalengka Regency, West Java. The findings revealed that while no errors occurred at the reading stage, 48% of students made comprehension errors, 57% made transformation errors, 66% experienced process skill errors, and 82% committed encoding errors. The most dominant errors were encoding errors, reflecting weaknesses in the aspects of evaluating evidence and drawing conclusions. Most encoding errors were influenced by students' lack of confidence and learning motivation. These results suggest that difficulties in earlier stages of problem-solving significantly affect students’ ability to arrive at correct final answers. The study emphasizes the importance of strengthening students’ procedural fluency and supporting their cognitive processes to improve mathematical problem-solving performance. Keywords: contextual, critical thinking skills, Newman’s error analysis, three-variable linear equation.

Jurnal Pendidikan MIPAVol. 26(3)
Universitas Majalengka (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.