The Shock‐Substorm of 24 September 1998: A Different Type of Substorm Trigger Onset
Abstract An interplanetary shock triggered a substorm with a peak intensity SML = −1,781 nT on 24 September 1998. This is called a shock‐substorm here to differentiate it from generic substorms. The shock, with a speed of ∼790 km s −1 , caused the release of prestored magnetosphere/magnetotail energy plus additional solar wind input energy, the latter unusual for a shock‐nonsupersubstorm event. The internal magnetospheric shock/wave had a speed of ∼1,775 km s −1 , consistent with arriving at x = −6 R E slightly prior to the time of substorm onset. The internal shock arrival to x = −10 R E would have been after the substorm onset. Magnetic reconnection for the substorm triggering can be ruled out. Magnetic compression at the midnight sector ground stations at LYC and OUJ (∼61° MLAT) were present prior to the substorm onset. This could have been caused by a magnetosonic wave traveling from the dayside to the nightside just outside the plasmasphere. Akasofu (2023, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac3187 ) has stated that there are many different types of substorm onsets. We believe that this shock‐substorm is different than generic substorms.
Authors
- Yusuke Ebihara (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2293-1557)
- Yasuhito Narita (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5332-8881)
- G. S. Lakhina (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8956-486X)
- Rajkumar Hajra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0447-1531)
- Karl‐Heinz Glaßmeier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4327-5576)
- B. T. Tsurutani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7299-9835)
Institutions
- Pasadena City College (US)
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Bharat Serums and Vaccines (India) (IN)
- Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Published
- 2025-08-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl115509
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.31
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Young Scientists Fund