CHALLENGES OF E-COURT IMPLEMENTATION IN STATE ADMINISTRATIVE CASES: A REVIEW OF REGULATIONS AND PRACTICE IN THE FIELD

P The implementation of the e-Court system in State Administration cases is a strategic step in the context of modernizing the judicial system in Indonesia. Through regulations such as PERMA No. 3 of 2018 and PERMA No. 1 of 2019, the Supreme Court encourages the digitization of administrative and trial processes to create a simple, fast, transparent, and low-cost judiciary. However, its implementation in various State Administrative Courts has not been optimal. Technical challenges, including inadequate infrastructure, limited human resources, and digital literacy gaps, continue to be significant obstacles. In addition, normative constraints, such as e-litigation procedures that rely on the parties' consent, contribute to the complexity of their implementation. This article employs an empirical juridical approach to assess the effectiveness of applicable regulations and their practical implementation in the field. The study's results suggest that regulatory harmonization, technical capacity building, and ongoing education are necessary to ensure that e-Court is an effective solution for administrative justice reform in Indonesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HERMENEUTIKA Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v9i2.10426
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CHALLENGES OF E-COURT IMPLEMENTATION IN STATE ADMINISTRATIVE CASES: A REVIEW OF REGULATIONS AND PRACTICE IN THE FIELD

Jun‐ichiro Hamada, Taufiq Alamsyah
1 links
HERMENEUTIKA Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

CHALLENGES OF E-COURT IMPLEMENTATION IN STATE ADMINISTRATIVE CASES: A REVIEW OF REGULATIONS AND PRACTICE IN THE FIELD

Jun‐ichiro Hamada, Taufiq Alamsyah
article en

Abstract

P The implementation of the e-Court system in State Administration cases is a strategic step in the context of modernizing the judicial system in Indonesia. Through regulations such as PERMA No. 3 of 2018 and PERMA No. 1 of 2019, the Supreme Court encourages the digitization of administrative and trial processes to create a simple, fast, transparent, and low-cost judiciary. However, its implementation in various State Administrative Courts has not been optimal. Technical challenges, including inadequate infrastructure, limited human resources, and digital literacy gaps, continue to be significant obstacles. In addition, normative constraints, such as e-litigation procedures that rely on the parties' consent, contribute to the complexity of their implementation. This article employs an empirical juridical approach to assess the effectiveness of applicable regulations and their practical implementation in the field. The study's results suggest that regulatory harmonization, technical capacity building, and ongoing education are necessary to ensure that e-Court is an effective solution for administrative justice reform in Indonesia.

HERMENEUTIKA Jurnal Ilmu HukumVol. 9(2)
Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung (ID), Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CHALLENGES OF E-COURT IMPLEMENTATION IN STATE ADMINISTRATIVE CASES: A REVIEW OF REGULATIONS AND PRACTICE IN THE FIELD — Jun‐ichiro Hamada, Taufiq Alamsyah · HERMENEUTIKA Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS