Enhancing Flood Susceptibility Mapping Through Machine Learning and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques

Flooding has historically caused massive social, economic and environmental damage affecting lives and livelihood. There is a concerted effort to study the phenomenon of flooding, hazard assessment, mitigation and prevention of flood and associated risks. In the planning phase, Flood Susceptibility Mapping (FSM) to identify vulnerable areas are useful to provide critical data for preparedness, risk management, and sustainable land use planning. Most flood susceptibility maps are generated using multi-criteria Decision models (MCDM) and Machine Learning models. The reliability and accuracy of Flood Susceptibility Maps are increased by systematic evaluation of multiple flood related factors and their interrelationship which are more easily analyzed by machine learning models. Therefore, the aim of the study is to develop FSM for Toorsa River and the Pasakha River. using the two multi-criteria Decision models, the Shannon Entropy model and the Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation method. Further FSM were also developed using two machine learning algorithms of Random Forest and Support Vector Machine. Factors such as elevation, slope, soil type, and land use/land cover, rainfall, and Topographic Wetness Index were assigned weights based on the two MCDM techniques to develop the maps. Similarly, the same factors were used for training ML models and validating their performance in flood-prone area classification. The results of the study shows that Area Under Curve scores were high (0.98) in both the study area using Random Forest while the lowest score of 0.21 was obtained for Pasakha river using the Shannon Entropy Model. In general the Machine Learning models are found to be more accurate, which may be attributed to its ability to interpret data in a non-linear manner unlike the MCDM methods. The final Flood Susceptibility Maps of the study area were produced based on Random Forest models, as it provided the most accurate results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zorig Melong.
Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17102/zmv8.i2.022
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Flood Susceptibility Mapping Through Machine Learning and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques

Pema Thinley, Sangey Pasang, Tashi Tenzin Dorji, Tshewang Zangmo
Zorig Melong.
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Enhancing Flood Susceptibility Mapping Through Machine Learning and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques

Pema Thinley, Sangey Pasang, Tashi Tenzin Dorji, Tshewang Zangmo
article en

Abstract

Flooding has historically caused massive social, economic and environmental damage affecting lives and livelihood. There is a concerted effort to study the phenomenon of flooding, hazard assessment, mitigation and prevention of flood and associated risks. In the planning phase, Flood Susceptibility Mapping (FSM) to identify vulnerable areas are useful to provide critical data for preparedness, risk management, and sustainable land use planning. Most flood susceptibility maps are generated using multi-criteria Decision models (MCDM) and Machine Learning models. The reliability and accuracy of Flood Susceptibility Maps are increased by systematic evaluation of multiple flood related factors and their interrelationship which are more easily analyzed by machine learning models. Therefore, the aim of the study is to develop FSM for Toorsa River and the Pasakha River. using the two multi-criteria Decision models, the Shannon Entropy model and the Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation method. Further FSM were also developed using two machine learning algorithms of Random Forest and Support Vector Machine. Factors such as elevation, slope, soil type, and land use/land cover, rainfall, and Topographic Wetness Index were assigned weights based on the two MCDM techniques to develop the maps. Similarly, the same factors were used for training ML models and validating their performance in flood-prone area classification. The results of the study shows that Area Under Curve scores were high (0.98) in both the study area using Random Forest while the lowest score of 0.21 was obtained for Pasakha river using the Shannon Entropy Model. In general the Machine Learning models are found to be more accurate, which may be attributed to its ability to interpret data in a non-linear manner unlike the MCDM methods. The final Flood Susceptibility Maps of the study area were produced based on Random Forest models, as it provided the most accurate results.

Zorig Melong.Vol. 8(2)
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.