CpFe(CO)<sub>2</sub> Radical Generated from Dinuclear [CpFe(CO)<sub>2</sub>]<sub>2</sub> and Mononuclear (Cp)(CO)<sub>2</sub>Fe(H): Density Functional Theory Is Accurate for One, But Not Both

Density functional theory (DFT) methods remain the most practical approach to calculating properties and reaction mechanisms of transition metal complexes. While the accuracy of DFT methods has been evaluated for some properties of mononuclear organometallic complexes there has been a general lack of evaluation for dinuclear organometallic complexes, in particular bonding changes related to reaction mechanisms. This work evaluated DFT and coupled cluster methods for the accuracy of calculating the CpFe(CO)<sub>2</sub> radical (Fp•) generated from dinuclear [CpFe(CO)<sub>2</sub>]<sub>2</sub> (Fp<sub>2</sub>) and mononuclear [(Cp)(CO)<sub>2</sub>Fe(H)] (Fp-H). This transition metal radical fragment was evaluated because dinuclear complexes built with it have recently shown a variety of unique reactions but has proven challenging to accurately calculate with DFT methods. Here we show that DFT methods provide a surprising wide range of fragmentation energies for Fp<sub>2</sub> and lower and mid rung DFT methods as well as DLPNO-CCSD(T) perform well for this dissociation energy. The highest rung double-hybrid methods have a large range in the Fp<sub>2</sub> dissociation energy, and the energy greatly depends on the amount of MP2 correlation energy included. For generating Fp• from Fp-H the lower and mid rung methods that worked well for Fp<sub>2</sub> showed significant error. Double-hybrid methods unfortunately are only accurate for the Fe-H bond if they are very inaccurate for the Fp<sub>2</sub> dissociation energy. While DLPNO-CCSD(T) is not perfect, and not close to chemically accurate for the Fe-H bond, it does provide reasonable accuracy for both Fp<sub>2</sub> and Fp-H dissociation energies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5c03507
Primary Topic
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CpFe(CO)2 Radical Generated from Dinuclear [CpFe(CO)2]2 and Mononuclear (Cp)(CO)2Fe(H): Density Functional Theory Is Accurate for One, But Not Both

Neal P. Mankad, Roushan Prakash Singh, Daniel H. Ess, Kevin P. Quirion
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
article

CpFe(CO)2 Radical Generated from Dinuclear [CpFe(CO)2]2 and Mononuclear (Cp)(CO)2Fe(H): Density Functional Theory Is Accurate for One, But Not Both

Neal P. Mankad, Roushan Prakash Singh, Daniel H. Ess, Kevin P. Quirion
article en

Abstract

Density functional theory (DFT) methods remain the most practical approach to calculating properties and reaction mechanisms of transition metal complexes. While the accuracy of DFT methods has been evaluated for some properties of mononuclear organometallic complexes there has been a general lack of evaluation for dinuclear organometallic complexes, in particular bonding changes related to reaction mechanisms. This work evaluated DFT and coupled cluster methods for the accuracy of calculating the CpFe(CO)<sub>2</sub> radical (Fp•) generated from dinuclear [CpFe(CO)<sub>2</sub>]<sub>2</sub> (Fp<sub>2</sub>) and mononuclear [(Cp)(CO)<sub>2</sub>Fe(H)] (Fp-H). This transition metal radical fragment was evaluated because dinuclear complexes built with it have recently shown a variety of unique reactions but has proven challenging to accurately calculate with DFT methods. Here we show that DFT methods provide a surprising wide range of fragmentation energies for Fp<sub>2</sub> and lower and mid rung DFT methods as well as DLPNO-CCSD(T) perform well for this dissociation energy. The highest rung double-hybrid methods have a large range in the Fp<sub>2</sub> dissociation energy, and the energy greatly depends on the amount of MP2 correlation energy included. For generating Fp• from Fp-H the lower and mid rung methods that worked well for Fp<sub>2</sub> showed significant error. Double-hybrid methods unfortunately are only accurate for the Fe-H bond if they are very inaccurate for the Fp<sub>2</sub> dissociation energy. While DLPNO-CCSD(T) is not perfect, and not close to chemically accurate for the Fe-H bond, it does provide reasonable accuracy for both Fp<sub>2</sub> and Fp-H dissociation energies.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry AVol. 129(35)
Brigham Young University (US), University of Illinois System (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Division of Chemistry, Basic Energy Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.