Simulation of the effect of hydraulic and solid residence times on the anaerobic digestion of readily and slowly biodegradable feedstocks for methane and chemicals production

This study uses a kinetic model (Monod and hydrolysis kinetics) of anaerobic digestion (AD) to investigate the effect of the residence time (HRT, hydraulic residence time and SRT, solids residence time) on process performance considering substrate removal, production of intermediate chemicals (modelled as acetic acid and hydrogen) and of the final product methane. Two types of feedstocks were considered, readily or slowly biodegradable substrates, with substrate concentration in the range 1–100 kg/m 3 . Two process configurations were simulated, without (completely mixed reactor, CSTR, without recycle) and with (CSTR with recycle) biomass retention. For the system without biomass retention (SRT=HRT), acetic acid and hydrogen were the main products from readily biodegradable feedstock in a range of intermediate residence times, while for longer residence times methane was the main product. Instead, for a slowly biodegradable feed, no hydrogen production and lower acetic acid production were calculated due to the longer residence times required for hydrolysis. In the system with biomass retention (SRT > HRT), the conversion of slowly biodegradable substrates was impacted not only by the SRT, as usually assumed, but also by the HRT. This can limit the effectiveness of anaerobic digestion in processes with biomass retention. The effect of the kinetic parameters for hydrolysis was investigated, indicating that processes with biomass retention are likely to be less effective than processes without biomass retention for feedstocks characterised by slow hydrolysis rate. Overall, this study provides insight into the effect of operating conditions on AD and on its optimum design to achieve the desired performance. • Choice of process configuration, HRT and SRT greatly affects AD performance. • Hydrogen production is only possible in a narrow range of residence times. • Continuous-flow AD cannot completely remove the acids from the digestate. • For AD with recycle, substrate conversion may be limited by short HRT. • AD without recycle is generally a better choice to achieve high acid yields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomass and Bioenergy
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108290
Primary Topic
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulation of the effect of hydraulic and solid residence times on the anaerobic digestion of readily and slowly biodegradable feedstocks for methane and chemicals production

Jenifer Benavides Sánchez, Inês Graça, Aniruddha Majumder, Davide Dionisi
Biomass and Bioenergy
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
article

Simulation of the effect of hydraulic and solid residence times on the anaerobic digestion of readily and slowly biodegradable feedstocks for methane and chemicals production

Jenifer Benavides Sánchez, Inês Graça, Aniruddha Majumder, Davide Dionisi
article en

Abstract

This study uses a kinetic model (Monod and hydrolysis kinetics) of anaerobic digestion (AD) to investigate the effect of the residence time (HRT, hydraulic residence time and SRT, solids residence time) on process performance considering substrate removal, production of intermediate chemicals (modelled as acetic acid and hydrogen) and of the final product methane. Two types of feedstocks were considered, readily or slowly biodegradable substrates, with substrate concentration in the range 1–100 kg/m 3 . Two process configurations were simulated, without (completely mixed reactor, CSTR, without recycle) and with (CSTR with recycle) biomass retention. For the system without biomass retention (SRT=HRT), acetic acid and hydrogen were the main products from readily biodegradable feedstock in a range of intermediate residence times, while for longer residence times methane was the main product. Instead, for a slowly biodegradable feed, no hydrogen production and lower acetic acid production were calculated due to the longer residence times required for hydrolysis. In the system with biomass retention (SRT > HRT), the conversion of slowly biodegradable substrates was impacted not only by the SRT, as usually assumed, but also by the HRT. This can limit the effectiveness of anaerobic digestion in processes with biomass retention. The effect of the kinetic parameters for hydrolysis was investigated, indicating that processes with biomass retention are likely to be less effective than processes without biomass retention for feedstocks characterised by slow hydrolysis rate. Overall, this study provides insight into the effect of operating conditions on AD and on its optimum design to achieve the desired performance. • Choice of process configuration, HRT and SRT greatly affects AD performance. • Hydrogen production is only possible in a narrow range of residence times. • Continuous-flow AD cannot completely remove the acids from the digestate. • For AD with recycle, substrate conversion may be limited by short HRT. • AD without recycle is generally a better choice to achieve high acid yields.

Biomass and BioenergyVol. 203
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.