Adolescents' engagement in sexting as a normative behavior: Profiles of consensual and coerced sexting

Sexting, the exchange of sexual messages or images by digital devices, has become increasingly common in adolescent relationships and is often viewed as a normative expression of teenage sexuality in the digital age. At the same time, sexting carries risks, especially when it is coerced or conducted without consent. The present study, conducted in Israel, used latent profile analysis to identify patterns of sexting behavior in adolescents and to examine differences in background factors in these profiles. Participants were 345 adolescents and young adults (all responses referred specifically to high school experiences) who completed an online survey of sexting behaviors, attitudes, and family communication. Three profiles emerged: non-sexters (83.8%), sexters (12.2%), and coerced sexters (4.1%). Non-sexters reported minimal sexting activity and more open communication with parents, sexters willingly engaged in sexting and embraced permissive sexting norms, and coerced sexters experienced sexting under pressure Girls were overrepresented in the sexter group (78.6% female) whereas the small coerced sexter group showed no significant gender difference. The profiles did not differ in self-reported religiosity but adolescents in the coerced sexter profile disclosed significantly less information to their parents than those in the two other groups. These findings indicate that although sexting by youths is common and often consensual, a subset experienced it as a form of digital sexual coercion. The results of the study can inform the design of sexting education and shape parenting practices. • Three adolescent sexting profiles identified: non-sexters, sexters, coerced sexters. • Coerced sexters show high coercion levels and harm minimization tendencies. • Lower parental disclosure linked to coerced sexting, emphasizing family role. • Open family communication acts as a protective factor against online sexual risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108777
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gender, Feminism, and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adolescents' engagement in sexting as a normative behavior: Profiles of consensual and coerced sexting

Michal Dolev-Cohen, Hila Shaul
3 citations
Computers in Human Behavior
Gender, Feminism, and Media
11.60
article

Adolescents' engagement in sexting as a normative behavior: Profiles of consensual and coerced sexting

Michal Dolev-Cohen, Hila Shaul
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Sexting, the exchange of sexual messages or images by digital devices, has become increasingly common in adolescent relationships and is often viewed as a normative expression of teenage sexuality in the digital age. At the same time, sexting carries risks, especially when it is coerced or conducted without consent. The present study, conducted in Israel, used latent profile analysis to identify patterns of sexting behavior in adolescents and to examine differences in background factors in these profiles. Participants were 345 adolescents and young adults (all responses referred specifically to high school experiences) who completed an online survey of sexting behaviors, attitudes, and family communication. Three profiles emerged: non-sexters (83.8%), sexters (12.2%), and coerced sexters (4.1%). Non-sexters reported minimal sexting activity and more open communication with parents, sexters willingly engaged in sexting and embraced permissive sexting norms, and coerced sexters experienced sexting under pressure Girls were overrepresented in the sexter group (78.6% female) whereas the small coerced sexter group showed no significant gender difference. The profiles did not differ in self-reported religiosity but adolescents in the coerced sexter profile disclosed significantly less information to their parents than those in the two other groups. These findings indicate that although sexting by youths is common and often consensual, a subset experienced it as a form of digital sexual coercion. The results of the study can inform the design of sexting education and shape parenting practices. • Three adolescent sexting profiles identified: non-sexters, sexters, coerced sexters. • Coerced sexters show high coercion levels and harm minimization tendencies. • Lower parental disclosure linked to coerced sexting, emphasizing family role. • Open family communication acts as a protective factor against online sexual risks.

Computers in Human BehaviorVol. 173
Oranim Academic College of Education (IL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Gender, Feminism, and Media
11.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Adolescents' engagement in sexting as a normative behavior: Profiles of consensual and coerced sexting — Michal Dolev-Cohen, Hila Shaul · Computers in Human Behavior (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS