Criminalization standard of providing false information in network account transactions and retrieving accounts unilaterally

In online account transactions, the seller providing false information and unilaterally retrieving the account are common actions that may lead to criminal prosecution. However, there is still controversy over the standards for convicting the two crimes in theory and practice. These two behaviours are both standard practices by sellers that harm the interests of buyers, and they may even co-occur in the same transaction. Moreover, under certain circumstances, these two behaviours may produce some ambiguity in definition or interrelatedness, thus making it valuable to study both simultaneously. Regarding providing false information, attention should be paid to its subjective intent and the standards of erroneous understanding. Regarding retrieving an account unilaterally, attention should be paid to its confidentiality requirements and the differences in civil and criminal boundaries and charges involved in the contract. In addition, for the behaviours of both parties, attention should be paid to the responsibilities of the operator platform and the transaction intermediary platform, as well as the establishment of accurate measurement standards for the market transaction value of accounts and the value of user investment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions on Social Science Education and Humanities Research
Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62051/1apq7n46
Primary Topic
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criminalization standard of providing false information in network account transactions and retrieving accounts unilaterally

Wenhao Xia
Transactions on Social Science Education and Humanities Research
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
article

Criminalization standard of providing false information in network account transactions and retrieving accounts unilaterally

Wenhao Xia
article en

Abstract

In online account transactions, the seller providing false information and unilaterally retrieving the account are common actions that may lead to criminal prosecution. However, there is still controversy over the standards for convicting the two crimes in theory and practice. These two behaviours are both standard practices by sellers that harm the interests of buyers, and they may even co-occur in the same transaction. Moreover, under certain circumstances, these two behaviours may produce some ambiguity in definition or interrelatedness, thus making it valuable to study both simultaneously. Regarding providing false information, attention should be paid to its subjective intent and the standards of erroneous understanding. Regarding retrieving an account unilaterally, attention should be paid to its confidentiality requirements and the differences in civil and criminal boundaries and charges involved in the contract. In addition, for the behaviours of both parties, attention should be paid to the responsibilities of the operator platform and the transaction intermediary platform, as well as the establishment of accurate measurement standards for the market transaction value of accounts and the value of user investment.

Transactions on Social Science Education and Humanities ResearchVol. 14
University of Leeds (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.