From Epistemic Injustice to AI Ethics: A Frickerian Approach to Gender Discrimination

Testimonial Injustice occurs when the speaker is wrongfully undermined in his/her capacity as a knower due to the identity prejudice against his/her, while Hermeneutical Injustice occurs when some social groups cannot make sense of their social experiences due to their exclusion from hermeneutical participation. Both kinds of injustice result from structural social prejudice and can especially disadvantage some groups but not others. In the real world, these two types of injustice are embodied in the design and practice of AI. Based on gender-biased data, AI further exacerbates the Testimonial Injustice women suffered when processing and accessing information. And the low participation rate of women in occupations such as Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics results in the low diversity and inclusiveness of AI technologies and exacerbates the Hermeneutic Injustice faced by women. Therefore, in the era of AI, these two types of injustice are practiced by new technologies and manifested in the aggravation of existing gender biases against women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions on Social Science Education and Humanities Research
Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62051/fe5pcr74
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Epistemic Injustice to AI Ethics: A Frickerian Approach to Gender Discrimination

Zhichao Cheng
Transactions on Social Science Education and Humanities Research
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

From Epistemic Injustice to AI Ethics: A Frickerian Approach to Gender Discrimination

Zhichao Cheng
article en

Abstract

Testimonial Injustice occurs when the speaker is wrongfully undermined in his/her capacity as a knower due to the identity prejudice against his/her, while Hermeneutical Injustice occurs when some social groups cannot make sense of their social experiences due to their exclusion from hermeneutical participation. Both kinds of injustice result from structural social prejudice and can especially disadvantage some groups but not others. In the real world, these two types of injustice are embodied in the design and practice of AI. Based on gender-biased data, AI further exacerbates the Testimonial Injustice women suffered when processing and accessing information. And the low participation rate of women in occupations such as Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics results in the low diversity and inclusiveness of AI technologies and exacerbates the Hermeneutic Injustice faced by women. Therefore, in the era of AI, these two types of injustice are practiced by new technologies and manifested in the aggravation of existing gender biases against women.

Transactions on Social Science Education and Humanities ResearchVol. 14
Fudan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Epistemic Injustice to AI Ethics: A Frickerian Approach to Gender Discrimination — Zhichao Cheng · Transactions on Social Science Education and Humanities Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS