Timing Mass of the Local Group

The classic model of the Local Group (LG) is that of two dominant constituents, the Milky Way and M31, first separating and then detaching from the Hubble flow, leading to a nearly radial-approaching orbit. This simple model has been confronted by new measurements of the three-dimensional M31 kinematics, by cosmological simulations, and by theoretical understanding of the impact of massive substructures, such as the Large Magellanic Cloud. This article explores the consequences of new observations and theory on the determination of the mass and dynamics of the LG. ▪ The M31 tangential velocity measurement and contribution from the cosmological constant both increase the implied timing mass of the LG to be ∼5 × 10 12 M ⊙ . ▪ Timing mass estimates for the LG tend to be greater than the sum of the Milky Way and M31 halo masses, and greater than independent LG mass estimators. ▪ Precision future kinematics have the potential to explore the origin of this difference and shed light on dark matter in the LG, the origin of its angular momentum, and possibly even local values of cosmological parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-121024-051405
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Timing Mass of the Local Group

Louis E. Strigari
1 citations
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
1.15
article

Timing Mass of the Local Group

Louis E. Strigari
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The classic model of the Local Group (LG) is that of two dominant constituents, the Milky Way and M31, first separating and then detaching from the Hubble flow, leading to a nearly radial-approaching orbit. This simple model has been confronted by new measurements of the three-dimensional M31 kinematics, by cosmological simulations, and by theoretical understanding of the impact of massive substructures, such as the Large Magellanic Cloud. This article explores the consequences of new observations and theory on the determination of the mass and dynamics of the LG. ▪ The M31 tangential velocity measurement and contribution from the cosmological constant both increase the implied timing mass of the LG to be ∼5 × 10 12 M ⊙ . ▪ Timing mass estimates for the LG tend to be greater than the sum of the Milky Way and M31 halo masses, and greater than independent LG mass estimators. ▪ Precision future kinematics have the potential to explore the origin of this difference and shed light on dark matter in the LG, the origin of its angular momentum, and possibly even local values of cosmological parameters.

Annual Review of Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 63(1)
Mitchell Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.