Comparison of fundamental cycles and maximal ideal cycles for normal surface double points—due to Laufer decomposition

For a resolution space $(\tilde{X}, E)$ of a normal complex surface singularity $(X, o)$, the fundamental cycle $Z_{E}$ and maximal ideal cycle $M_{E}$ are important geometric objects associated to $(X, o)$, which satisfy $M_{E} \geqq Z_{E}$. In 1966, M. Artin proved that $M_{E} = Z_{E}$ for all resolutions of all rational singularities. However, for non-rational singularities, it is a delicate problem whether $M_{E} = Z_{E}$ or not. Any normal surface double point (i.e., multiplicity two) is a hypersurface singularity defined by $z^{2} = f(x, y)$. For such singularities, we prove that $M_{E} > Z_{E}$ holds on the minimal resolution if and only if $f$ has a canonical decomposition $f = f_{[L]} f_{[c]} f_{[o]}$ in $\mathbb{C}\{x, y\}$ called “Laufer decomposition”. Moreover, we give a numerical procedure to determine whether $M_{E} = Z_{E}$ or not on the minimal resolution from the embedded topology of the branch curve singularity $(\{f = 0\}, o)$.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2969/jmsj/91949194
Primary Topic
Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of fundamental cycles and maximal ideal cycles for normal surface double points—due to Laufer decomposition

Masataka Tomari, Tadashi Tomaru
Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan
Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
article

Comparison of fundamental cycles and maximal ideal cycles for normal surface double points—due to Laufer decomposition

Masataka Tomari, Tadashi Tomaru
article en

Abstract

For a resolution space $(\tilde{X}, E)$ of a normal complex surface singularity $(X, o)$, the fundamental cycle $Z_{E}$ and maximal ideal cycle $M_{E}$ are important geometric objects associated to $(X, o)$, which satisfy $M_{E} \geqq Z_{E}$. In 1966, M. Artin proved that $M_{E} = Z_{E}$ for all resolutions of all rational singularities. However, for non-rational singularities, it is a delicate problem whether $M_{E} = Z_{E}$ or not. Any normal surface double point (i.e., multiplicity two) is a hypersurface singularity defined by $z^{2} = f(x, y)$. For such singularities, we prove that $M_{E} > Z_{E}$ holds on the minimal resolution if and only if $f$ has a canonical decomposition $f = f_{[L]} f_{[c]} f_{[o]}$ in $\mathbb{C}\{x, y\}$ called “Laufer decomposition”. Moreover, we give a numerical procedure to determine whether $M_{E} = Z_{E}$ or not on the minimal resolution from the embedded topology of the branch curve singularity $(\{f = 0\}, o)$.

Journal of the Mathematical Society of JapanVol. -1(-1)
Nihon University (JP), Gunma University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.