An Alternative Way of Determining Biases and Weights for the Training of Neural Networks

The determination of biases and weights in neural networks is a fundamental aspect of their performance, traditionally employing methods like steepest descent and stochastic gradient descent. While these supervised training approaches have proven effective, this technical note confidently presents a groundbreaking alternative that eliminates randomness in calculations altogether. This innovative method calculates biases and weights as precise solutions to a system of equations. This approach not only reduces computational demands but also enhances energy efficiency significantly. By strategically incorporating target values during training, we can expand the number of target values within acceptable variance limits, enabling the formation of square matrices. This ensures that input and output nodes remain perfectly balanced through the generation of fictive data, particularly for output nodes. These fuzzy sets guarantee that the variance of neuron target values stays within permissible limits, effectively minimizing error. The generated data is intentionally minimal and can also be produced using random processes, facilitating effective learning for the neural networks. Unlike conventional techniques, the values of biases and weights are determined directly, leading to a process that is both faster and less energy-intensive. Our primary objective is to establish an efficient foundation for the training data of the neural network. Moreover, these calculated values serve as robust initial parameters for integration with other determination methods, including stochastic gradient descent and steepest descent. This presentation showcases a powerful new algorithm, poised to significantly enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of neural network training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajai.20250902.14
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Alternative Way of Determining Biases and Weights for the Training of Neural Networks

H.M. Cekirge
5 citations
American Journal of Artificial Intelligence
Neural Networks and Applications
12.40
article

An Alternative Way of Determining Biases and Weights for the Training of Neural Networks

H.M. Cekirge
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The determination of biases and weights in neural networks is a fundamental aspect of their performance, traditionally employing methods like steepest descent and stochastic gradient descent. While these supervised training approaches have proven effective, this technical note confidently presents a groundbreaking alternative that eliminates randomness in calculations altogether. This innovative method calculates biases and weights as precise solutions to a system of equations. This approach not only reduces computational demands but also enhances energy efficiency significantly. By strategically incorporating target values during training, we can expand the number of target values within acceptable variance limits, enabling the formation of square matrices. This ensures that input and output nodes remain perfectly balanced through the generation of fictive data, particularly for output nodes. These fuzzy sets guarantee that the variance of neuron target values stays within permissible limits, effectively minimizing error. The generated data is intentionally minimal and can also be produced using random processes, facilitating effective learning for the neural networks. Unlike conventional techniques, the values of biases and weights are determined directly, leading to a process that is both faster and less energy-intensive. Our primary objective is to establish an efficient foundation for the training data of the neural network. Moreover, these calculated values serve as robust initial parameters for integration with other determination methods, including stochastic gradient descent and steepest descent. This presentation showcases a powerful new algorithm, poised to significantly enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of neural network training.

American Journal of Artificial IntelligenceVol. 9(2)
City College of New York (US), City University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Neural Networks and Applications
12.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.