Long-term economic and yield comparison of organic and conventional cotton-based production systems with wheat and soybean rotations in central India

The rising demand for organic products has intensified comparisons between organic and conventional farming systems, especially for smallholders. Balancing productivity and profitability is key to supporting sustainable farming. This study assesses the economic and yield performance of organic versus conventional cotton-based systems with wheat and soybean rotations in central India. Conducted over eight cropping cycles, each comprising 2-year rotations, the long-term experiment (LTE) compared biodynamic, organic, conventional, and conventional Bt cotton systems. Organic crops yielded between 77 % (wheat) and 102 % (soybean) of their conventional counterparts. Organic cotton yielded 93 % relative to non-Bt and 82 % relative to Bt conventional cotton, with year-to-year variations. Cotton had the highest total production costs, with Bt conventional costs 5 % higher due to higher seed and fertilizer expenses. Input costs for soybean were approximately 28 % lower in organic systems, while wheat showed 6 % higher costs in conventional treatments. The Bt cotton conventional system showed the highest mean annual gross margins, 11 % higher than other systems, though no significant differences were observed among the other three. Cotton gross margins, influenced by its high production costs, contributed substantially to income variability across all systems. These findings suggest that adaptations in crop management and rotation diversity can play a more crucial role in determining farm income than the choice between organic and conventional practices. This offers insights for similar agro-ecological contexts, emphasizing the importance of tailoring rotations and inputs to local conditions for the economic resilience of smallholders. • Organic cotton exhibited relative yields of 93 % and 82 % compared to non-Bt and Bt cotton. • Relative yields of organic crops ranged from 77 % for wheat to 102 % for soybeans. • Conventional systems with Bt cotton showed a 11 % higher mean annual gross margin. • Farm income is more significantly impacted by adaptations and crop diversity within the system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Agronomy
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2025.127814
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term economic and yield comparison of organic and conventional cotton-based production systems with wheat and soybean rotations in central India

Ishwar Patidar, Akanksha Singh, Amritbir Riar, Gurbir S. Bhullar et al.
1 links
European Journal of Agronomy
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

Long-term economic and yield comparison of organic and conventional cotton-based production systems with wheat and soybean rotations in central India

Ishwar Patidar, Akanksha Singh, Amritbir Riar, Gurbir S. Bhullar, Eva Goldmann, Sabine Stuerz, Chigusa Keller, Bhupendra Sisodia
article en

Abstract

The rising demand for organic products has intensified comparisons between organic and conventional farming systems, especially for smallholders. Balancing productivity and profitability is key to supporting sustainable farming. This study assesses the economic and yield performance of organic versus conventional cotton-based systems with wheat and soybean rotations in central India. Conducted over eight cropping cycles, each comprising 2-year rotations, the long-term experiment (LTE) compared biodynamic, organic, conventional, and conventional Bt cotton systems. Organic crops yielded between 77 % (wheat) and 102 % (soybean) of their conventional counterparts. Organic cotton yielded 93 % relative to non-Bt and 82 % relative to Bt conventional cotton, with year-to-year variations. Cotton had the highest total production costs, with Bt conventional costs 5 % higher due to higher seed and fertilizer expenses. Input costs for soybean were approximately 28 % lower in organic systems, while wheat showed 6 % higher costs in conventional treatments. The Bt cotton conventional system showed the highest mean annual gross margins, 11 % higher than other systems, though no significant differences were observed among the other three. Cotton gross margins, influenced by its high production costs, contributed substantially to income variability across all systems. These findings suggest that adaptations in crop management and rotation diversity can play a more crucial role in determining farm income than the choice between organic and conventional practices. This offers insights for similar agro-ecological contexts, emphasizing the importance of tailoring rotations and inputs to local conditions for the economic resilience of smallholders. • Organic cotton exhibited relative yields of 93 % and 82 % compared to non-Bt and Bt cotton. • Relative yields of organic crops ranged from 77 % for wheat to 102 % for soybeans. • Conventional systems with Bt cotton showed a 11 % higher mean annual gross margin. • Farm income is more significantly impacted by adaptations and crop diversity within the system.

European Journal of AgronomyVol. 171
Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), Forschungsinstitut für Biologischen Landbau (CH)
Biovision Foundation for Ecological Development, Liechtenstein Development Service, Direktion für Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.