Improving sustainability of inland Pacific Northwest dryland agriculture systems with pea-canola intercropping: a review

Changing weather conditions are having negative impacts on dryland (rainfed) crop production systems such as those found in the inland Pacific Northwest (iPNW). This region is dominated by winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) production and also produces alternative crops such as canola ( Brassica napus L.) and peas ( Pisum sativum L.). Producers need crop rotations and agronomic management strategies that are equally productive and more sustainable than traditional winter wheat-fallow systems. New crop rotations should prioritize crop water use efficiency (WUE), protect soil health, and manage herbicide-resistant weeds. Intercropping is one practice that can promote agroecosystem biodiversity, soil health, drought resilience, and resource use efficiency (RUE), among other ecosystem services. Spring pea and spring canola intercropping, also referred to as “peaola,” is emerging as an alternative crop rotation and management strategy for the dryland iPNW mainly because it increases RUE and WUE, while reducing production inputs. However, little is known about producing peaola in the iPNW. Therefore, this review seeks to address a wide range of topics, including (but not limited to) ecological and agronomic aspects of intercropped systems, the impact of peaola production on soil health, the potential of peaola to reduce pest pressure and improve drought resilience, and examples of barriers that may prevent the adoption of peaola in the iPNW. Findings indicate that peaola can provide agroecosystem benefits such as improved water infiltration, soil organic matter turnover, nutrient cycling, and increased land use efficiency. However, complexity of management, a lack of region-specific research, and marketing constraints are legitimate challenges barring the immediate adoption of peaola. Nonetheless, peaola has the potential to improve cereal crop production and promote sustainability in dryland agricultural systems across the iPNW.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1639908
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving sustainability of inland Pacific Northwest dryland agriculture systems with pea-canola intercropping: a review

Garett C. Heineck, Donald John Wysocki, Haly Neely, Jyoti Singh et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
3.81
article

Improving sustainability of inland Pacific Northwest dryland agriculture systems with pea-canola intercropping: a review

Garett C. Heineck, Donald John Wysocki, Haly Neely, Jyoti Singh, Shikha Singh, Lauren R. Stubbs
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Changing weather conditions are having negative impacts on dryland (rainfed) crop production systems such as those found in the inland Pacific Northwest (iPNW). This region is dominated by winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) production and also produces alternative crops such as canola ( Brassica napus L.) and peas ( Pisum sativum L.). Producers need crop rotations and agronomic management strategies that are equally productive and more sustainable than traditional winter wheat-fallow systems. New crop rotations should prioritize crop water use efficiency (WUE), protect soil health, and manage herbicide-resistant weeds. Intercropping is one practice that can promote agroecosystem biodiversity, soil health, drought resilience, and resource use efficiency (RUE), among other ecosystem services. Spring pea and spring canola intercropping, also referred to as “peaola,” is emerging as an alternative crop rotation and management strategy for the dryland iPNW mainly because it increases RUE and WUE, while reducing production inputs. However, little is known about producing peaola in the iPNW. Therefore, this review seeks to address a wide range of topics, including (but not limited to) ecological and agronomic aspects of intercropped systems, the impact of peaola production on soil health, the potential of peaola to reduce pest pressure and improve drought resilience, and examples of barriers that may prevent the adoption of peaola in the iPNW. Findings indicate that peaola can provide agroecosystem benefits such as improved water infiltration, soil organic matter turnover, nutrient cycling, and increased land use efficiency. However, complexity of management, a lack of region-specific research, and marketing constraints are legitimate challenges barring the immediate adoption of peaola. Nonetheless, peaola has the potential to improve cereal crop production and promote sustainability in dryland agricultural systems across the iPNW.

Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsVol. 9
Oregon State University (US), Prostate Cancer Research (GB), Washington State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
3.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.