The role of identity in a multilevel interdependence in international relations: exploring popular understandings of international politics

This study investigates the role of identity as a critical factor in mediating the relationship between local and regional politics within the broader context of international relations (IR). While identity is frequently acknowledged as a catalyst for political instability and conflict, its function in fostering interdependence across political levels remains underexplored, particularly through empirical research. To address this gap, the study adopts a quantitative methodology, drawing on theories of identity politics and interdependence. A structured survey was administered to assess public perceptions of identity's influence on international engagement and its bridging role between domestic and regional political dynamics. The findings indicate that respondents identify several key mechanisms through which identity fosters interconnection: cross-border solidarity, state-building processes, political legitimacy and survival, identity discourse in foreign policy, and the influence of non-state actors. Notably, participants expressed concern that instrumentalizing identity in state-building poses security threats at various levels—local (37.2%), national (18.2%), international (11.7%), and regional (9%). The data also reveal that ideological divides between social movements and state authorities, as well as transnational alliances between non-state actors and foreign powers, undermine state legitimacy and stability. The study contributes to theoretical and empirical debates in IR by demonstrating how identity shapes political interactions across multiple governance levels. It emphasizes the importance of public perceptions in legitimizing political engagement and reveals how identity can simultaneously serve as a unifying and destabilizing force in regional and international contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Political Science
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1595969
Citations
2
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of identity in a multilevel interdependence in international relations: exploring popular understandings of international politics

Rashed Alrasheed, Khalid Amur Salim Al-Shamli, Aicha Kada Benabdallah, Ibtisam Mohammed Abed Al-Ameri et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Political Science
International Relations and Foreign Policy
17.04
article

The role of identity in a multilevel interdependence in international relations: exploring popular understandings of international politics

Rashed Alrasheed, Khalid Amur Salim Al-Shamli, Aicha Kada Benabdallah, Ibtisam Mohammed Abed Al-Ameri, Nahla Elshorbagy
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the role of identity as a critical factor in mediating the relationship between local and regional politics within the broader context of international relations (IR). While identity is frequently acknowledged as a catalyst for political instability and conflict, its function in fostering interdependence across political levels remains underexplored, particularly through empirical research. To address this gap, the study adopts a quantitative methodology, drawing on theories of identity politics and interdependence. A structured survey was administered to assess public perceptions of identity's influence on international engagement and its bridging role between domestic and regional political dynamics. The findings indicate that respondents identify several key mechanisms through which identity fosters interconnection: cross-border solidarity, state-building processes, political legitimacy and survival, identity discourse in foreign policy, and the influence of non-state actors. Notably, participants expressed concern that instrumentalizing identity in state-building poses security threats at various levels—local (37.2%), national (18.2%), international (11.7%), and regional (9%). The data also reveal that ideological divides between social movements and state authorities, as well as transnational alliances between non-state actors and foreign powers, undermine state legitimacy and stability. The study contributes to theoretical and empirical debates in IR by demonstrating how identity shapes political interactions across multiple governance levels. It emphasizes the importance of public perceptions in legitimizing political engagement and reveals how identity can simultaneously serve as a unifying and destabilizing force in regional and international contexts.

Frontiers in Political ScienceVol. 7
University of Baghdad (IQ), Applied Science University (BH), Sultan Qaboos University (OM), Helwan University (EG), Abu Dhabi National Oil (United Arab Emirates) (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.