A Study on Methodologies of Select Global Ranking Frameworks

The largest change in higher education since the turn of the century has been the advancement of research, teaching, and learning motivated by university rankings in response to a growing appreciation of the significance of quality. The history of the global university ranking system began with the publication of US News and World Reports in 1983. The present system of university rankings began in 2003 with the publication of Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) by Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China. Later, a number of institutes and organizations developed different university ranking models. Methodically university ranking frameworks are different while considering their parameters and ranking indicators. The Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World University Ranking, and Times Higher Education World University Ranking (THE) are three of the major ranking systems which are widely accepted globally. The present study examines, in a comparative perspective, the indicators, parameters, methodology, and design of the mentioned the three ranking frameworks. In order to understand the underlying techniques, ramifications, and issues surrounding university rankings, this research study explores their complex environment. The study may through light into the significance of academic and administrative affairs of institutions of higher education to a great extent.