Thinking beyond the tablet: Acceptability of different HIV-PrEP modalities among GBMSM and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men in the UK

BackgroundHIV-PrEP is a key component of HIV combination prevention and has been routinely available through oral formulations (i.e. oral tablets) across sexual health services (SHSs) in the UK since 2020. We used data from a large, online community survey to assess the acceptability and preference of different HIV-PrEP modalities among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) and gender-diverse individuals living in the UK.MethodsUsing data collected from the 'Reducing inequalities in Sexual Health' (RiiSH) survey, an online community survey of 1106 GBMSM and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men (November/December 2023), we performed a secondary analysis examining HIV-PrEP modality acceptability and preference (e.g. oral, long acting injectable, gel, or patch) (%) by HIV-PrEP history (never, in lookback period of last 3-4 months since survey completion). Where ≥2 modalities were indicated, participants were asked to specify a single preferred modality. Single choice options were assumed to be the preferred HIV-PrEP modality.ResultsIrrespective of HIV-PrEP history, long acting injectables were highly acceptable (>70%) and the preferred modality (58% [222/386] by those never having used HIV-PrEP, 73% [75/103] in those without HIV-PrEP use in the lookback, 74% [314/424] in those with HIV-PrEP use in the lookback).ConclusionsWe found high acceptability of the use of injectables, with general preference over oral tablets. If injectable HIV-PrEP becomes available at SHSs in England, these modalities could have positive impacts on HIV-PrEP delivery, use, and access.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of STD & AIDS
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624251369093
Citations
1
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thinking beyond the tablet: Acceptability of different HIV-PrEP modalities among GBMSM and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men in the UK

Catherine Heather Mercer, Dawn Phillips, Natasha Ratna, T Djuretic et al.
1 citations
International Journal of STD & AIDS
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
1.40
article

Thinking beyond the tablet: Acceptability of different HIV-PrEP modalities among GBMSM and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men in the UK

Catherine Heather Mercer, Dawn Phillips, Natasha Ratna, T Djuretic, Hamish Mohammed, E. J. Bell, Dana Ogaz, Kate Folkard, Stephanie J Migchelsen, Dolores Mullen, John Saunders, Will Nutland, David M. Reid, Hridhya Vijayan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BackgroundHIV-PrEP is a key component of HIV combination prevention and has been routinely available through oral formulations (i.e. oral tablets) across sexual health services (SHSs) in the UK since 2020. We used data from a large, online community survey to assess the acceptability and preference of different HIV-PrEP modalities among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) and gender-diverse individuals living in the UK.MethodsUsing data collected from the 'Reducing inequalities in Sexual Health' (RiiSH) survey, an online community survey of 1106 GBMSM and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men (November/December 2023), we performed a secondary analysis examining HIV-PrEP modality acceptability and preference (e.g. oral, long acting injectable, gel, or patch) (%) by HIV-PrEP history (never, in lookback period of last 3-4 months since survey completion). Where ≥2 modalities were indicated, participants were asked to specify a single preferred modality. Single choice options were assumed to be the preferred HIV-PrEP modality.ResultsIrrespective of HIV-PrEP history, long acting injectables were highly acceptable (>70%) and the preferred modality (58% [222/386] by those never having used HIV-PrEP, 73% [75/103] in those without HIV-PrEP use in the lookback, 74% [314/424] in those with HIV-PrEP use in the lookback).ConclusionsWe found high acceptability of the use of injectables, with general preference over oral tablets. If injectable HIV-PrEP becomes available at SHSs in England, these modalities could have positive impacts on HIV-PrEP delivery, use, and access.

International Journal of STD & AIDSVol. 37(1)
National Security Agency (US), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), UK Health Security Agency (GB), University College London (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.